[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201220090755.2fuxts4mhsa4sbgm@skbuf>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:07:55 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>,
Rene van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: rename MT7621 compatible
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 12:21:53AM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> MT7621 is a SoC, so using "mediatek,mt7621" as its compatible is ambiguous.
> Rename it to "mediatek,mt7621-gsw".
>
> Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
> ---
I would say that you need to resolve the situation with the docs at
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,mt7620-gsw.txt
and with the bindings at drivers/staging/mt7621-dts/mt7621.dtsi first
(or in the same series). And still then, it would be nice if you could
preserve compatibility with the existing bindings at least for a while.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists