lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 21 Dec 2020 10:12:08 +0100
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:     Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        CrosBT Upstreaming <chromeos-bluetooth-upstreaming@...omium.org>,
        Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...omium.org>,
        Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@...omium.org>,
        Yun-Hao Chung <howardchung@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] Bluetooth: advmon offload MSFT handle controller
 reset

Hi Archie,

> When the controller is powered off, the registered advertising monitor
> is removed from the controller. This patch handles the re-registration
> of those monitors when the power is on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Yun-Hao Chung <howardchung@...gle.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)
> 
> net/bluetooth/msft.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/msft.c b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> index f5aa0e3b1b9b..7e33a85c3f1c 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> @@ -82,8 +82,15 @@ struct msft_data {
> 	struct list_head handle_map;
> 	__u16 pending_add_handle;
> 	__u16 pending_remove_handle;
> +
> +	struct {
> +		u8 reregistering:1;
> +	} flags;
> };

hmmm. Do you have bigger plans with this struct? I would just skip it.

Regards

Marcel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists