[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874kkd97sl.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:31:22 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/24] wfx: add data_tx.c/data_tx.h
Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com> writes:
> +void wfx_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_tx_control *control,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct wfx_dev *wdev = hw->priv;
> + struct wfx_vif *wvif;
> + struct ieee80211_sta *sta = control ? control->sta : NULL;
> + struct ieee80211_tx_info *tx_info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
> + struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data;
> + size_t driver_data_room = sizeof_field(struct ieee80211_tx_info,
> + rate_driver_data);
> +
> + compiletime_assert(sizeof(struct wfx_tx_priv) <= driver_data_room,
> + "struct tx_priv is too large");
Interesting, never seen compiletime_assert() before. But I suspect
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() is preferred, at least there are more users.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists