[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160865406506.3593456.8475116968286355613.stgit@firesoul>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:21:05 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
maze@...gle.com, lmb@...udflare.com, shaun@...era.io,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, marek@...udflare.com,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, eyal.birger@...il.com,
colrack@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next V10 7/7] bpf/selftests: tests using bpf_check_mtu
BPF-helper
Adding selftest for BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu(). Making sure
it can be used from both XDP and TC.
V10:
- Remove errno non-zero test in CHECK_ATTR()
- Addresse comments from Andrii Nakryiko
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c | 218 ++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 417 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..63f01c9e08d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2020 Jesper Dangaard Brouer */
+
+#include <linux/if_link.h> /* before test_progs.h, avoid bpf_util.h redefines */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "test_check_mtu.skel.h"
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <inttypes.h>
+
+#define IFINDEX_LO 1
+
+static __u32 duration; /* Hint: needed for CHECK macro */
+
+static int read_mtu_device_lo(void)
+{
+ const char *filename = "/sys/class/net/lo/mtu";
+ char buf[11] = {};
+ int value;
+ int fd;
+
+ fd = open(filename, 0, O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd == -1)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)) == -1) {
+ close(fd);
+ return -2;
+ }
+ close(fd);
+
+ value = strtoimax(buf, NULL, 10);
+ if (errno == ERANGE)
+ return -3;
+
+ return value;
+}
+
+static void test_check_mtu_xdp_attach()
+{
+ struct bpf_link_info link_info;
+ __u32 link_info_len = sizeof(link_info);
+ struct test_check_mtu *skel;
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+ int err = 0;
+ int fd;
+
+ skel = test_check_mtu__open_and_load();
+ if (CHECK(!skel, "open and load skel", "failed"))
+ return; /* Exit if e.g. helper unknown to kernel */
+
+ prog = skel->progs.xdp_use_helper_basic;
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_xdp(prog, IFINDEX_LO);
+ if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "link_attach", "failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link)))
+ goto out;
+ skel->links.xdp_use_helper_basic = link;
+
+ memset(&link_info, 0, sizeof(link_info));
+ fd = bpf_link__fd(link);
+ err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &link_info, &link_info_len);
+ if (CHECK(err, "link_info", "failed: %d\n", err))
+ goto out;
+
+ CHECK(link_info.type != BPF_LINK_TYPE_XDP, "link_type",
+ "got %u != exp %u\n", link_info.type, BPF_LINK_TYPE_XDP);
+ CHECK(link_info.xdp.ifindex != IFINDEX_LO, "link_ifindex",
+ "got %u != exp %u\n", link_info.xdp.ifindex, IFINDEX_LO);
+
+ err = bpf_link__detach(link);
+ CHECK(err, "link_detach", "failed %d\n", err);
+
+out:
+ test_check_mtu__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_check_mtu_run_xdp(struct test_check_mtu *skel,
+ struct bpf_program *prog,
+ __u32 mtu_expect)
+{
+ const char *prog_name = bpf_program__name(prog);
+ int retval_expect = XDP_PASS;
+ __u32 mtu_result = 0;
+ char buf[256] = {};
+ int err;
+ struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = {
+ .repeat = 1,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .data_out = buf,
+ .data_size_out = sizeof(buf),
+ .prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog),
+ };
+
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr);
+ CHECK_ATTR(err != 0, "bpf_prog_test_run",
+ "prog_name:%s (err %d errno %d retval %d)\n",
+ prog_name, err, errno, tattr.retval);
+
+ CHECK(tattr.retval != retval_expect, "retval",
+ "progname:%s unexpected retval=%d expected=%d\n",
+ prog_name, tattr.retval, retval_expect);
+
+ /* Extract MTU that BPF-prog got */
+ mtu_result = skel->bss->global_bpf_mtu_xdp;
+ ASSERT_EQ(mtu_result, mtu_expect, "MTU-compare-user");
+}
+
+
+static void test_check_mtu_xdp(__u32 mtu, __u32 ifindex)
+{
+ struct test_check_mtu *skel;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = test_check_mtu__open();
+ if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed"))
+ return;
+
+ /* Update "constants" in BPF-prog *BEFORE* libbpf load */
+ skel->rodata->GLOBAL_USER_MTU = mtu;
+ skel->rodata->GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX = ifindex;
+
+ err = test_check_mtu__load(skel);
+ if (CHECK(err, "skel_load", "failed: %d\n", err))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ test_check_mtu_run_xdp(skel, skel->progs.xdp_use_helper, mtu);
+ test_check_mtu_run_xdp(skel, skel->progs.xdp_exceed_mtu, mtu);
+ test_check_mtu_run_xdp(skel, skel->progs.xdp_minus_delta, mtu);
+
+cleanup:
+ test_check_mtu__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_check_mtu_run_tc(struct test_check_mtu *skel,
+ struct bpf_program *prog,
+ __u32 mtu_expect)
+{
+ const char *prog_name = bpf_program__name(prog);
+ int retval_expect = BPF_OK;
+ __u32 mtu_result = 0;
+ char buf[256] = {};
+ int err;
+ struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = {
+ .repeat = 1,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .data_out = buf,
+ .data_size_out = sizeof(buf),
+ .prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog),
+ };
+
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr);
+ CHECK_ATTR(err != 0, "bpf_prog_test_run",
+ "prog_name:%s (err %d errno %d retval %d)\n",
+ prog_name, err, errno, tattr.retval);
+
+ CHECK(tattr.retval != retval_expect, "retval",
+ "progname:%s unexpected retval=%d expected=%d\n",
+ prog_name, tattr.retval, retval_expect);
+
+ /* Extract MTU that BPF-prog got */
+ mtu_result = skel->bss->global_bpf_mtu_tc;
+ ASSERT_EQ(mtu_result, mtu_expect, "MTU-compare-user");
+}
+
+
+static void test_check_mtu_tc(__u32 mtu, __u32 ifindex)
+{
+ struct test_check_mtu *skel;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = test_check_mtu__open();
+ if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed"))
+ return;
+
+ /* Update "constants" in BPF-prog *BEFORE* libbpf load */
+ skel->rodata->GLOBAL_USER_MTU = mtu;
+ skel->rodata->GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX = ifindex;
+
+ err = test_check_mtu__load(skel);
+ if (CHECK(err, "skel_load", "failed: %d\n", err))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_use_helper, mtu);
+ test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_exceed_mtu, mtu);
+ test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_exceed_mtu_da, mtu);
+ test_check_mtu_run_tc(skel, skel->progs.tc_minus_delta, mtu);
+cleanup:
+ test_check_mtu__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_check_mtu(void)
+{
+ __u32 mtu_lo;
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu XDP-attach"))
+ test_check_mtu_xdp_attach();
+
+ mtu_lo = read_mtu_device_lo();
+ if (CHECK(mtu_lo < 0, "reading MTU value", "failed (err:%d)", mtu_lo))
+ return;
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu XDP-run"))
+ test_check_mtu_xdp(mtu_lo, 0);
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu XDP-run ifindex-lookup"))
+ test_check_mtu_xdp(mtu_lo, IFINDEX_LO);
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu TC-run"))
+ test_check_mtu_tc(mtu_lo, 0);
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu TC-run ifindex-lookup"))
+ test_check_mtu_tc(mtu_lo, IFINDEX_LO);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d31cbf403683
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2020 Jesper Dangaard Brouer */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <linux/if_ether.h>
+
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/* Userspace will update with MTU it can see on device */
+static volatile const int GLOBAL_USER_MTU;
+static volatile const __u32 GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX;
+
+/* BPF-prog will update these with MTU values it can see */
+__u32 global_bpf_mtu_xdp = 0;
+__u32 global_bpf_mtu_tc = 0;
+
+SEC("xdp")
+int xdp_use_helper_basic(struct xdp_md *ctx)
+{
+ __u32 mtu_len = 0;
+
+ if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, 0, &mtu_len, 0, 0))
+ return XDP_ABORTED;
+
+ return XDP_PASS;
+}
+
+SEC("xdp")
+int xdp_use_helper(struct xdp_md *ctx)
+{
+ int retval = XDP_PASS; /* Expected retval on successful test */
+ __u32 mtu_len = 0;
+ __u32 ifindex = 0;
+ int delta = 0;
+
+ /* When ifindex is zero, save net_device lookup and use ctx netdev */
+ if (GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX > 0)
+ ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX;
+
+ if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0)) {
+ /* mtu_len is also valid when check fail */
+ retval = XDP_ABORTED;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (mtu_len != GLOBAL_USER_MTU)
+ retval = XDP_DROP;
+
+out:
+ global_bpf_mtu_xdp = mtu_len;
+ return retval;
+}
+
+SEC("xdp")
+int xdp_exceed_mtu(struct xdp_md *ctx)
+{
+ void *data_end = (void *)(long)ctx->data_end;
+ void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data;
+ __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX;
+ __u32 data_len = data_end - data;
+ int retval = XDP_ABORTED; /* Fail */
+ __u32 mtu_len = 0;
+
+ int delta;
+ int err;
+
+ /* Exceed MTU with 1 via delta adjust */
+ delta = GLOBAL_USER_MTU - (data_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1;
+
+ err = bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0);
+ if (err) {
+ retval = XDP_PASS; /* Success in exceeding MTU check */
+ if (err != BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED)
+ retval = XDP_DROP;
+ }
+
+ global_bpf_mtu_xdp = mtu_len;
+ return retval;
+}
+
+SEC("xdp")
+int xdp_minus_delta(struct xdp_md *ctx)
+{
+ int retval = XDP_PASS; /* Expected retval on successful test */
+ void *data_end = (void *)(long)ctx->data_end;
+ void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data;
+ __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX;
+ __u32 data_len = data_end - data;
+ __u32 mtu_len = 0;
+ int delta;
+
+ /* Boarderline test case: Minus delta exceeding packet length allowed */
+ delta = -((data_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1);
+
+ /* Minus length (adjusted via delta) still pass MTU check, other helpers
+ * are responsible for catching this, when doing actual size adjust
+ */
+ if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0))
+ retval = XDP_ABORTED;
+
+ global_bpf_mtu_xdp = mtu_len;
+ return retval;
+}
+
+SEC("classifier")
+int tc_use_helper(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ int retval = BPF_OK; /* Expected retval on successful test */
+ __u32 mtu_len = 0;
+ int delta = 0;
+
+ if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, 0, &mtu_len, delta, 0)) {
+ retval = BPF_DROP;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (mtu_len != GLOBAL_USER_MTU)
+ retval = BPF_REDIRECT;
+out:
+ global_bpf_mtu_tc = mtu_len;
+ return retval;
+}
+
+SEC("classifier")
+int tc_exceed_mtu(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX;
+ int retval = BPF_DROP; /* Fail */
+ __u32 skb_len = ctx->len;
+ __u32 mtu_len = 0;
+ int delta;
+ int err;
+
+ /* Exceed MTU with 1 via delta adjust */
+ delta = GLOBAL_USER_MTU - (skb_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1;
+
+ err = bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0);
+ if (err) {
+ retval = BPF_OK; /* Success in exceeding MTU check */
+ if (err != BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED)
+ retval = BPF_DROP;
+ }
+
+ global_bpf_mtu_tc = mtu_len;
+ return retval;
+}
+
+SEC("classifier")
+int tc_exceed_mtu_da(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ /* SKB Direct-Access variant */
+ void *data_end = (void *)(long)ctx->data_end;
+ void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data;
+ __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX;
+ __u32 data_len = data_end - data;
+ int retval = BPF_DROP; /* Fail */
+ __u32 mtu_len = 0;
+ int delta;
+ int err;
+
+ /* Exceed MTU with 1 via delta adjust */
+ delta = GLOBAL_USER_MTU - (data_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1;
+
+ err = bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0);
+ if (err) {
+ retval = BPF_OK; /* Success in exceeding MTU check */
+ if (err != BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED)
+ retval = BPF_DROP;
+ }
+
+ global_bpf_mtu_tc = mtu_len;
+ return retval;
+}
+
+SEC("classifier")
+int tc_minus_delta(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ int retval = BPF_OK; /* Expected retval on successful test */
+ __u32 ifindex = GLOBAL_USER_IFINDEX;
+ __u32 skb_len = ctx->len;
+ __u32 mtu_len = 0;
+ int delta;
+
+ /* Boarderline test case: Minus delta exceeding packet length allowed */
+ delta = -((skb_len - ETH_HLEN) + 1);
+
+ /* Minus length (adjusted via delta) still pass MTU check, other helpers
+ * are responsible for catching this, when doing actual size adjust
+ */
+ if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, ifindex, &mtu_len, delta, 0))
+ retval = BPF_DROP;
+
+ global_bpf_mtu_xdp = mtu_len;
+ return retval;
+}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists