lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:53:37 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC:     <andrii@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: work-around EBUSY errors from hashmap update/delete

20b6cc34ea74 ("bpf: Avoid hashtab deadlock with map_locked") introduced
a possibility of getting EBUSY error on lock contention, which seems to happen
very deterministically in test_maps when running 1024 threads on low-CPU
machine. In libbpf CI case, it's a 2 CPU VM and it's hitting this 100% of the
time. Work around by retrying on EBUSY (and EAGAIN, while we are at it) after
a small sleep. sched_yield() is too agressive and fails even after 20 retries,
so I went with usleep(1) for backoff.

Also log actual error returned to make it easier to see what's going on.

Fixes: 20b6cc34ea74 ("bpf: Avoid hashtab deadlock with map_locked")
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index 0ad3e6305ff0..809004f4995f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -1312,22 +1312,56 @@ static void test_map_stress(void)
 #define DO_UPDATE 1
 #define DO_DELETE 0
 
+static int map_update_retriable(int map_fd, const void *key, const void *value,
+				int flags, int attempts)
+{
+	while (bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, key, value, flags)) {
+		if (!attempts || (errno != EAGAIN && errno != EBUSY))
+			return -errno;
+
+		usleep(1);
+		attempts--;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int map_delete_retriable(int map_fd, const void *key, int attempts)
+{
+	while (bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key)) {
+		if (!attempts || (errno != EAGAIN && errno != EBUSY))
+			return -errno;
+
+		usleep(1);
+		attempts--;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void test_update_delete(unsigned int fn, void *data)
 {
 	int do_update = ((int *)data)[1];
 	int fd = ((int *)data)[0];
-	int i, key, value;
+	int i, key, value, err;
 
 	for (i = fn; i < MAP_SIZE; i += TASKS) {
 		key = value = i;
 
 		if (do_update) {
-			assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &key, &value,
-						   BPF_NOEXIST) == 0);
-			assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &key, &value,
-						   BPF_EXIST) == 0);
+			err = map_update_retriable(fd, &key, &value, BPF_NOEXIST, 20);
+			if (err)
+				printf("error %d %d\n", err, errno);
+			assert(err == 0);
+			err = map_update_retriable(fd, &key, &value, BPF_EXIST, 20);
+			if (err)
+				printf("error %d %d\n", err, errno);
+			assert(err == 0);
 		} else {
-			assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(fd, &key) == 0);
+			err = map_delete_retriable(fd, &key, 5);
+			if (err)
+				printf("error %d %d\n", err, errno);
+			assert(err == 0);
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.24.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists