netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] ibmvnic: continue fatal error reset after passive init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:00:06 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ibmvnic: continue fatal error reset after passive init

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:49:04 -0600 you wrote:
> Commit f9c6cea0b385 ("ibmvnic: Skip fatal error reset after passive init")
> says "If the passive
> CRQ initialization occurs before the FATAL reset task is processed,
> the FATAL error reset task would try to access a CRQ message queue
> that was freed, causing an oops. The problem may be most likely to
> occur during DLPAR add vNIC with a non-default MTU, because the DLPAR
> process will automatically issue a change MTU request.
> Fix this by not processing fatal error reset if CRQ is passively
> initialized after client-driven CRQ initialization fails."
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,v2] ibmvnic: continue fatal error reset after passive init
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/1f45dc220667

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html