netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: Fix memleak in ethoc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201224180631.l4zieher54ncqvwl@chatter.i7.local>
Date:   Thu, 24 Dec 2020 13:06:31 -0500
From:   Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>, kjlu@....edu,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: Fix memleak in ethoc_probe

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 05:41:46PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > >> Does patchwork not automagically add Fixes: lines from full up emails?
> > >> That seems like a reasonable automation.  
> > > 
> > > Looks like it's been a TODO for 3 years now:
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/151  
> > 
> > It was proposed before, but rejected. You can have your local patchwork
> > admin take care of that for you though and add custom tags:
> > 
> > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/2017-January/003910.html
> 
> Konstantin, would you be willing to mod the kernel.org instance of
> patchwork to populate Fixes tags in the generated mboxes?

I'd really rather not -- we try not to diverge from project upstream if at all
possible, as this dramatically complicates upgrades.

-K