[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <327d6cad23720c8fe984aa75a046ff69499568c8.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 09:06:51 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, gustavoars@...nel.org,
louis.peens@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfp: remove h from printk format specifier
On Fri, 2020-12-25 at 06:56 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 12/24/20 2:39 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > Kernel code doesn't use a signed char or short with %hx or %hu very often
> > but in case you didn't already know, any signed char/short emitted with
> > anything like %hx or %hu needs to be left alone as sign extension occurs so:
>
> Yes, this would also effect checkpatch.
Of course but checkpatch is stupid and doesn't know types
so it just assumes that the type argument is not signed.
In general, that's a reasonable but imperfect assumption.
coccinelle could probably do this properly as it's a much
better parser. clang-tidy should be able to as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists