netdev - Re: [RFC v2 09/13] vduse: Add support for processing vhost iotlb message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e77c97c5-6bdc-cdd0-62c0-6ff75f6dbdff@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Dec 2020 16:43:18 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, sgarzare@...hat.com,
        Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        axboe@...nel.dk, bcrl@...ck.org, corbet@....net,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 09/13] vduse: Add support for processing vhost iotlb
 message


On 2020/12/28 下午4:14, Yongji Xie wrote:
>> I see. So all the above two questions are because VHOST_IOTLB_INVALIDATE
>> is expected to be synchronous. This need to be solved by tweaking the
>> current VDUSE API or we can re-visit to go with descriptors relaying first.
>>
> Actually all vdpa related operations are synchronous in current
> implementation. The ops.set_map/dma_map/dma_unmap should not return
> until the VDUSE_UPDATE_IOTLB/VDUSE_INVALIDATE_IOTLB message is replied
> by userspace. Could it solve this problem?


  I was thinking whether or not we need to generate IOTLB_INVALIDATE 
message to VDUSE during dma_unmap (vduse_dev_unmap_page).

If we don't, we're probably fine.

Thanks


>
> Thanks,
> Yongji
>