[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMArcTVQmwrbeT=LNsNhSP4Cykz-ZchbpS4RQJpo=J_F8Pv-aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 11:26:44 +0900
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, martin.varghese@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] bareudp: Fix use of incorrect min_headroom size
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 01:33, Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com> wrote:
>
Hi Guillaume,
Thank you for the review!
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 05:13:08PM +0000, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> > In the bareudp6_xmit_skb(), it calculates min_headroom.
> > At that point, it uses struct iphdr, but it's not correct.
> > So panic could occur.
> > The struct ipv6hdr should be used.
> >
> > Test commands:
> > ip netns add A
> > ip netns add B
> > ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
> > ip link set veth0 netns A
>
> Missing "ip link set veth1 netns B", so the reproducer unfortunately
> doesn't work.
>
Sorry, This is my mistake.
> BTW, you can also simplify the script by creating the veth devices
> directly in the right netns:
> ip link add name veth0 netns A type veth peer name veth1 netns B
>
Thanks, It's really useful to me :)
> Apart from that,
> Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
>
> And thanks a lot for the reproducers!
Thank you so much for the review,
I will send a v2 patch, which will fix a reproducer script.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists