netdev - Re: [PATCH rfc 1/3] virtio-net: support transmit hash report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201228122155-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:22:28 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc 1/3] virtio-net: support transmit hash report

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:47:45AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:28 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:22:31AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > Virtio-net supports sharing the flow hash from host to guest on rx.
> > > Do the same on transmit, to allow the host to infer connection state
> > > for more robust routing and telemetry.
> > >
> > > Linux derives ipv6 flowlabel and ECMP multipath from sk->sk_txhash,
> > > and updates these fields on error with sk_rethink_txhash. This feature
> > > allows the host to make similar decisions.
> > >
> > > Besides the raw hash, optionally also convey connection state for
> > > this hash. Specifically, the hash rotates on transmit timeout. To
> > > avoid having to keep a stateful table in the host to detect flow
> > > changes, explicitly notify when a hash changed due to timeout.
> >
> > I don't actually see code using VIRTIO_NET_HASH_STATE_TIMEOUT_BIT
> > in this series. Want to split out that part to a separate patch?
> 
> Will do.
> 
> I wanted to make it clear that these bits must be reserved (i.e.,
> zero) until a later patch specifies them.

Already the case for the padding field I think ...

> The timeout notification feature requires additional plumbing between
> the TCP protocol stack and device driver, probably an skb bit. I'd
> like to leave that as follow-up for now.
> 
> Thanks for the fast feedback!