[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCD7cOPZf8NpkhpRG2PiuMcjtqwxu7vQQoXULpCBbTCAoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 03:12:21 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: Enable GSWIP_MII_CFG_EN also
for internal PHYs
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 3:09 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 02:25:43AM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Enable GSWIP_MII_CFG_EN also for internal PHYs to make traffic flow.
> > Without this the PHY link is detected properly and ethtool statistics
> > for TX are increasing but there's no RX traffic coming in.
> >
> > Fixes: 14fceff4771e51 ("net: dsa: Add Lantiq / Intel DSA driver for vrx200")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> Hi Martin
>
> No need to Cc: stable. David or Jakub will handle the backport to
> stable. You should however set the subject to [PATCH net 1/2] and
> base the patches on the net tree, not net-next.
do you recommend re-sending these patches and changing the subject?
the lantiq_gswip.c driver is identical in -net and -net-next and so
the patch will apply fine in both cases
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists