[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea07c16e-6bc5-0371-4b53-4bf4c75d5af8@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:05:06 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: mst@...hat.com, elic@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2 7/7] vdpa_sim_net: Add support for user
supported devices
On 2021/1/4 上午11:31, Parav Pandit wrote:
> static int __init vdpasim_net_init(void)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -176,6 +264,8 @@ static int __init vdpasim_net_init(void)
>
> if (default_device)
> ret = vdpasim_net_default_dev_register();
> + else
> + ret = vdpasim_net_mgmtdev_init();
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -183,6 +273,8 @@ static void __exit vdpasim_net_exit(void)
> {
> if (default_device)
> vdpasim_net_default_dev_unregister();
> + else
> + vdpasim_net_mgmtdev_cleanup();
> }
>
> module_init(vdpasim_net_init);
> -- 2.26.2
I wonder what's the value of keeping the default device that is out of
the control of management API.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists