[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210106131006.577312-4-olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:09:59 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 03/10] net: switchdev: delete switchdev_port_obj_add_now
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
After the removal of the transactional model inside
switchdev_port_obj_add_now, it has no added value and we can just call
switchdev_port_obj_notify directly, bypassing this function. Let's
delete it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
---
Changes in v2:
None.
net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 17 +++++------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
index a575bb33ee6c..3509d362056d 100644
--- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
+++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
@@ -242,23 +242,15 @@ static int switchdev_port_obj_notify(enum switchdev_notifier_type nt,
return 0;
}
-static int switchdev_port_obj_add_now(struct net_device *dev,
- const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
-{
- ASSERT_RTNL();
-
- return switchdev_port_obj_notify(SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD,
- dev, obj, extack);
-}
-
static void switchdev_port_obj_add_deferred(struct net_device *dev,
const void *data)
{
const struct switchdev_obj *obj = data;
int err;
- err = switchdev_port_obj_add_now(dev, obj, NULL);
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+ err = switchdev_port_obj_notify(SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD,
+ dev, obj, NULL);
if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
netdev_err(dev, "failed (err=%d) to add object (id=%d)\n",
err, obj->id);
@@ -290,7 +282,8 @@ int switchdev_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
if (obj->flags & SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER)
return switchdev_port_obj_add_defer(dev, obj);
ASSERT_RTNL();
- return switchdev_port_obj_add_now(dev, obj, extack);
+ return switchdev_port_obj_notify(SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD,
+ dev, obj, extack);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(switchdev_port_obj_add);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists