[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210106005053.GG1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 00:50:53 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: iop32x: improve N2100 PCI broken parity quirk
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 06:28:33PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:42:31AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > {
> > - if (dev->bus->number == 0 &&
> > - (dev->devfn == PCI_DEVFN(1, 0) ||
> > - dev->devfn == PCI_DEVFN(2, 0)))
> > - dev->broken_parity_status = 1;
> > + if (machine_is_n2100())
> > + pci_quirk_broken_parity(dev);
>
> Whatever "machine_is_n2100()" is (I can't find the definition), it is
> surely not equivalent to "00:01.0 || 00:02.0". That change probably
> should be a separate patch with some explanation.
It isn't equivalent. It says "if this machine is N2100" which is a
completely different thing from matching the bus/devfn numbers.
You won't find a definition for machine_is_n2100() in the kernel;
it is generated from the machine table by scripts, along with lots
of similar definitions for each machine type:
/* The type of machine we're running on */
extern unsigned int __machine_arch_type;
#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_N2100
# ifdef machine_arch_type
# undef machine_arch_type
# define machine_arch_type __machine_arch_type
# else
# define machine_arch_type MACH_TYPE_N2100
# endif
# define machine_is_n2100() (machine_arch_type == MACH_TYPE_N2100)
#else
# define machine_is_n2100() (0)
#endif
The upshot of the above is that machine_is_n2100() is constant zero
if the platform is not configured (thereby allowing the compiler to
eliminate the code.) If it is the _only_ platform selected, then it
evaluates to an always-true expression. Otherwise, it becomes a
run-time evaluated conditional.
We may have better ways to do this in modern kernels, but this was
invented decades ago, and works with zero runtime overhead.
> If this makes the quirk safe to use in a generic kernel, that sounds
> like a good thing.
>
> I guess a parity problem could be the result of a defect in either the
> device (e.g., 0x8169), which would be an issue in *all* platforms, or
> a platform-specific issue in the way it's wired up. I assume it's the
> latter because the quirk is not in drivers/pci/quirks.c.
>
> Why is it safe to restrict this to device ID 0x8169? If this is
> platform issue, it might affect any device in the slot.
You assume the platform has multiple PCI slots - it doesn't. It's an
embedded platform (it's sold as a NAS) and it has a single mini-PCI
slot for a WiFi card. Without that populated, lspci -n looks like
this:
00:01.0 0200: 10ec:8169 (rev 10)
00:02.0 0200: 10ec:8169 (rev 10)
00:03.0 0180: 1095:3512 (rev 01)
00:04.0 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 61)
00:04.1 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 61)
00:04.2 0c03: 1106:3104 (rev 63)
Where all those devices are soldered to the board.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists