| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:37:48 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Schreiber <tschreibe@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] net: sfp: assume that LOS is not implemented if both LOS normal and inverted is set
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Some GPON SFP modules (e.g. Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant) have set both
SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED and SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL bits in their EEPROM.
Such combination of bits is meaningless so assume that LOS signal is not
implemented.
This patch fixes link carrier for GPON SFP module Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
* Fix author/signed-off-by lines
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index c0a891cdcd73..15fb8f7dfe5b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -1488,15 +1488,19 @@ static void sfp_sm_link_down(struct sfp *sfp)
static void sfp_sm_link_check_los(struct sfp *sfp)
{
- unsigned int los = sfp->state & SFP_F_LOS;
+ const __be16 los_inverted = cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED);
+ const __be16 los_normal = cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL);
+ __be16 los_options = sfp->id.ext.options & (los_inverted | los_normal);
+ bool los = false;
/* If neither SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED nor SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL
- * are set, we assume that no LOS signal is available.
+ * are set, we assume that no LOS signal is available. If both are
+ * set, we assume LOS is not implemented (and is meaningless.)
*/
- if (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED))
- los ^= SFP_F_LOS;
- else if (!(sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL)))
- los = 0;
+ if (los_options == los_inverted)
+ los = !(sfp->state & SFP_F_LOS);
+ else if (los_options == los_normal)
+ los = !!(sfp->state & SFP_F_LOS);
if (los)
sfp_sm_next(sfp, SFP_S_WAIT_LOS, 0);
@@ -1506,18 +1510,22 @@ static void sfp_sm_link_check_los(struct sfp *sfp)
static bool sfp_los_event_active(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
{
- return (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED) &&
- event == SFP_E_LOS_LOW) ||
- (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL) &&
- event == SFP_E_LOS_HIGH);
+ const __be16 los_inverted = cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED);
+ const __be16 los_normal = cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL);
+ __be16 los_options = sfp->id.ext.options & (los_inverted | los_normal);
+
+ return (los_options == los_inverted && event == SFP_E_LOS_LOW) ||
+ (los_options == los_normal && event == SFP_E_LOS_HIGH);
}
static bool sfp_los_event_inactive(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
{
- return (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED) &&
- event == SFP_E_LOS_HIGH) ||
- (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL) &&
- event == SFP_E_LOS_LOW);
+ const __be16 los_inverted = cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED);
+ const __be16 los_normal = cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL);
+ __be16 los_options = sfp->id.ext.options & (los_inverted | los_normal);
+
+ return (los_options == los_inverted && event == SFP_E_LOS_HIGH) ||
+ (los_options == los_normal && event == SFP_E_LOS_LOW);
}
static void sfp_sm_fault(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int next_state, bool warn)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists