[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98b79572-4445-3e4f-062a-590a874943e9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 01:57:47 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: iop32x: improve N2100 PCI broken parity quirk
On 06.01.2021 01:52, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:44:03AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> The machine type check is there to protect from (theoretical) cases
>> where the n2100 code (incl. the RTL8169 quirk) may be compiled in,
>> but the kernel is used on another machine.
>
> That is far from a theoretical case. The ARM port has always supported
> multiple machines in a single kernel. They just had to be "compatible"
> in other words, the same SoC. All the platforms supported by
> arch/arm/mach-iop32x can be built as a single kernel image and run on
> any of those platforms.
>
Good to know, then we indeed need the machine check. IOW, based on
what you state we could even now have the following situation:
N2100 support is compiled in, and the kernel is used on another machine
that by chance also has Realtek RTL8169 in PCI slots 1 or 2.
Then the PCI quirk would be applied, even though the machine doesn't
have the parity issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists