[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0Uf4eP=_rs66_=kx3z2Pmc8JB7McSUMv6DjZXbjboH0ptw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 13:53:42 -0800
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, aelior@...vell.com,
GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, rajur@...lsio.com,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, tariqt@...dia.com,
saeedm@...dia.com, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com,
ecree.xilinx@...il.com, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] udp_tunnel_nic: post conversion cleanup
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:07 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> It has been two releases since we added the common infra for UDP
> tunnel port offload, and we have not heard of any major issues.
> Remove the old direct driver NDOs completely, and perform minor
> simplifications in the tunnel drivers.
>
> Jakub Kicinski (4):
> udp_tunnel: hard-wire NDOs to udp_tunnel_nic_*_port() helpers
> udp_tunnel: remove REGISTER/UNREGISTER handling from tunnel drivers
> net: remove ndo_udp_tunnel_* callbacks
> udp_tunnel: reshuffle NETIF_F_RX_UDP_TUNNEL_PORT checks
The patch set looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists