[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210107104048.GB1102653@shredder.lan>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 12:40:48 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, petrm@...dia.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 03/11] net: switchdev: remove the transaction
structure from port object notifiers
Forgot to actually add Petr
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 12:38:39PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> +Petr
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:17:20AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > static int mlxsw_sp_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
> > const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
> > - struct switchdev_trans *trans,
> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > {
> > struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port = netdev_priv(dev);
> > const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan;
> > + struct switchdev_trans trans;
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > switch (obj->id) {
> > case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN:
> > vlan = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(obj);
> > - err = mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add(mlxsw_sp_port, vlan, trans,
> > +
>
> Got the regression results. The call to mlxsw_sp_span_respin() should be
> placed here because it needs to be triggered regardless of the return
> value of mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add().
>
> I'm looking into another failure, which might not be related to these
> patches. I will also have results with a debug kernel tomorrow (takes
> almost a day to complete). Will let you know.
>
> > + trans.ph_prepare = true;
> > + err = mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add(mlxsw_sp_port, vlan, &trans,
> > extack);
> > + if (err)
> > + break;
> >
> > - if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans)) {
> > - /* The event is emitted before the changes are actually
> > - * applied to the bridge. Therefore schedule the respin
> > - * call for later, so that the respin logic sees the
> > - * updated bridge state.
> > - */
> > - mlxsw_sp_span_respin(mlxsw_sp_port->mlxsw_sp);
> > - }
> > + /* The event is emitted before the changes are actually
> > + * applied to the bridge. Therefore schedule the respin
> > + * call for later, so that the respin logic sees the
> > + * updated bridge state.
> > + */
> > + mlxsw_sp_span_respin(mlxsw_sp_port->mlxsw_sp);
> > +
> > + trans.ph_prepare = false;
> > + err = mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add(mlxsw_sp_port, vlan, &trans,
> > + extack);
> > break;
> > case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_MDB:
> > err = mlxsw_sp_port_mdb_add(mlxsw_sp_port,
> > - SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_MDB(obj),
> > - trans);
> > + SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_MDB(obj));
> > break;
> > default:
> > err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists