netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2] tc: flower: fix json output with mpls lse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210107091352.610abd6f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jan 2021 09:13:52 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] tc: flower: fix json output with mpls lse

On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 17:48:56 +0100 Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 11:25:32PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > The json output of the TCA_FLOWER_KEY_MPLS_OPTS attribute was invalid.
> > 
> > Example:
> > 
> >   $ tc filter add dev eth0 ingress protocol mpls_uc flower mpls \
> >       lse depth 1 label 100                                     \
> >       lse depth 2 label 200
> > 
> >   $ tc -json filter show dev eth0 ingress
> >     ...{"eth_type":"8847",
> >         "  mpls":["    lse":["depth":1,"label":100],
> >                   "    lse":["depth":2,"label":200]]}...  
> 
> Is there any problem with this patch?
> It's archived in patchwork, but still in state "new". Therefore I guess
> it was dropped before being considered for review.

Erm, that's weird. I think Alexei mentioned that auto-archiving is
turned on in the new netdevbpf patchwork instance. My guess is it got
auto archived :S

Here is the list of all patches that are Archived as New:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?state=1&archive=true

Should any of these have been reviewed?