[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210107172726.2420292-6-olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 19:27:21 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch,
f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
alexandru.marginean@....com, claudiu.manoil@....com,
xiaoliang.yang_1@....com, hongbo.wang@....com, kuba@...nel.org,
jiri@...nulli.us, idosch@...sch.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 05/10] net: dsa: felix: perform teardown in reverse order of setup
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
In general it is desirable that cleanup is the reverse process of setup.
In this case I am not seeing any particular issue, but with the
introduction of devlink-sb for felix, a non-obvious decision had to be
made as to where to put its cleanup method. When there's a convention in
place, that decision becomes obvious.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
Changes in v2:
None.
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
index 74f3334ed6f8..a9bf8ea7bbce 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
@@ -638,14 +638,13 @@ static void felix_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
struct felix *felix = ocelot_to_felix(ocelot);
int port;
- if (felix->info->mdio_bus_free)
- felix->info->mdio_bus_free(ocelot);
-
+ if (ocelot->ptp)
+ ocelot_deinit_timestamp(ocelot);
+ ocelot_deinit(ocelot);
for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++)
ocelot_deinit_port(ocelot, port);
- ocelot_deinit_timestamp(ocelot);
- /* stop workqueue thread */
- ocelot_deinit(ocelot);
+ if (felix->info->mdio_bus_free)
+ felix->info->mdio_bus_free(ocelot);
}
static int felix_hwtstamp_get(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists