netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] nfc: Add a virtual nci device driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACwDmQAKky89hBzmOR0FOy=B0HQ8-APj0MEKBFwUHtnTSWXh_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Jan 2021 07:38:29 +0900
From:   Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon2@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfc@...ts.01.org,
        Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] nfc: Add a virtual nci device driver

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:01 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:16:47 +0900 Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:48 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > thank you for your answer.
> > > > I think that neard(NFC deamon) is necessary to test the NCI subsystem
> > > > meaningfully.
> > > > The NCI virtual device in user space can communicate with neard
> > > > through this driver.
> > > > Is it enough to make NCI virtual device at tools/nfc for some test?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if I understand. Are you asking if it's okay for the test
> > > or have a dependency on neard?
> >
> > Sorry for confusing you.
> > There is no dependency between neard and a NCI virtual device.
> > But, To test the NCI module, it is necessary to make an application like neard.
> > Is it okay to just make a NCI virtual device as a tool at tools/nfc
> > without the application?
>
> Meaning the device will be created but there will be no test cases in
> the tree?

yes.

>
> What we'd like to see is some form of a test which would exercise the
> NFC-related kernel code on such a device and can signal success /
> failure. It doesn't have to be very complex.
>
> You can build a more complex user space applications and tests
> separately.

okay. I understand it. I will try to make it.