lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 09:04:43 +0100 From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, "R, Vignesh" <vigneshr@...com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Remove support for TX49xx Hi Nemoto-san, On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:18 AM Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:41:24 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote: > >> > Is that sufficient to keep it? > >> > >> for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then... > > > > Indeed. Fortunately not all of it, as some removals were TX4938-only. > > These patches should not break RBTX4927: > > net: tc35815: Drop support for TX49XX boards > spi: txx9: Remove driver > mtd: Remove drivers used by TX49xx > char: hw_random: Remove tx4939 driver > rtc: tx4939: Remove driver > ide: tx4938ide: Remove driver Indeed. > And these patches just break audio-support only. > > dma: tx49 removal > ASoC: txx9: Remove driver > > I think dma and ASoC drivers are hard to maintain now, and can be > dropped for basic support for RBTX4927. > (TX39 boards does not have audio-support, so dma txx9 driver can be > dropped too) Agreed, I don't test audio anyway, but I know it used to work (I had intended to use the board as an MPD media server, but never got beyond the prototyping phase). Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists