[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+1KEyGDm-9RXpK4H6aWtn5Zmo3rgj_+zWYwFXhxm8bvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:27:08 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 10/12] net: bonding: ensure .ndo_get_stats64
can sleep
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:21 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 10:14:01AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > If you disagree, repost a rebased patch series so that we can
> > test/compare and choose the best solution.
>
> I would rather use Saeed's time as a reviewer to my existing and current
> patch set.
Yes, same feeling here, but Saeed brought back his own old
implementation, so maybe he does not feel the same way ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists