[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210108163159.358043-15-olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 18:31:57 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 net-next 14/16] net: net_failover: ensure .ndo_get_stats64 can sleep
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
The failover framework sets up a virtio_net interface [ when it has the
VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature ] and a VF interface, having the same MAC
address, in a standby/active relationship. When the active VF is
unplugged, the standby virtio_net temporarily kicks in.
The failover framework registers a common upper for the active and the
standby interface, which is what the application layer uses. This is
similar to bonding/team. The statistics of the upper interface are the
sum of the statistics of the active and of the standby interface.
There is an effort to convert .ndo_get_stats64 to sleepable context, and
for that to work, we need to prevent callers of dev_get_stats from using
atomic locking. The failover driver needs protection via an RCU
read-side critical section to access the standby and the active
interface. This has two features:
- It is atomic: this needs to change.
- It is reentrant: this is ok, because generally speaking, dev_get_stats
is recursive, and taking global locks is a bad thing from a recursive
context.
The existing logic can be rehashed just a little bit such that the
recursive dev_get_stats call will not be under any lock. We can achieve
that by "cheating" a little bit and use dev_hold() to take a reference
on the active and backup interfaces, and netdev_wait_allrefs() will just
have to wait until dev_get_stats() finishes.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
Changes in v5:
Use rcu_read_lock() and do not change the locking architecture of the
driver.
Changes in v4:
Now there is code to propagate errors.
Changes in v3:
None.
Changes in v2:
Switched to the new scheme of holding just a refcnt to the slave
interfaces while recursing with dev_get_stats.
drivers/net/net_failover.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/net_failover.c b/drivers/net/net_failover.c
index 7f70555e68d1..3e8a4046c748 100644
--- a/drivers/net/net_failover.c
+++ b/drivers/net/net_failover.c
@@ -183,38 +183,64 @@ static int net_failover_get_stats(struct net_device *dev,
struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
{
struct net_failover_info *nfo_info = netdev_priv(dev);
- struct rtnl_link_stats64 temp;
- struct net_device *slave_dev;
+ struct rtnl_link_stats64 primary_stats;
+ struct rtnl_link_stats64 standby_stats;
+ struct net_device *primary_dev;
+ struct net_device *standby_dev;
int err = 0;
- spin_lock(&nfo_info->stats_lock);
- memcpy(stats, &nfo_info->failover_stats, sizeof(*stats));
-
rcu_read_lock();
- slave_dev = rcu_dereference(nfo_info->primary_dev);
- if (slave_dev) {
- err = dev_get_stats(slave_dev, &temp);
+ primary_dev = rcu_dereference(nfo_info->primary_dev);
+ if (primary_dev)
+ dev_hold(primary_dev);
+
+ standby_dev = rcu_dereference(nfo_info->standby_dev);
+ if (standby_dev)
+ dev_hold(standby_dev);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ /* Don't hold rcu_read_lock while calling dev_get_stats, just a
+ * reference to ensure they won't get unregistered.
+ */
+ if (primary_dev) {
+ err = dev_get_stats(primary_dev, &primary_stats);
if (err)
goto out;
- net_failover_fold_stats(stats, &temp, &nfo_info->primary_stats);
- memcpy(&nfo_info->primary_stats, &temp, sizeof(temp));
}
- slave_dev = rcu_dereference(nfo_info->standby_dev);
- if (slave_dev) {
- err = dev_get_stats(slave_dev, &temp);
+ if (standby_dev) {
+ err = dev_get_stats(standby_dev, &standby_stats);
if (err)
goto out;
- net_failover_fold_stats(stats, &temp, &nfo_info->standby_stats);
- memcpy(&nfo_info->standby_stats, &temp, sizeof(temp));
}
-out:
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ spin_lock(&nfo_info->stats_lock);
+
+ memcpy(stats, &nfo_info->failover_stats, sizeof(*stats));
+
+ if (primary_dev) {
+ net_failover_fold_stats(stats, &primary_stats,
+ &nfo_info->primary_stats);
+ memcpy(&nfo_info->primary_stats, &primary_stats,
+ sizeof(primary_stats));
+ }
+ if (standby_dev) {
+ net_failover_fold_stats(stats, &standby_stats,
+ &nfo_info->standby_stats);
+ memcpy(&nfo_info->standby_stats, &standby_stats,
+ sizeof(standby_stats));
+ }
memcpy(&nfo_info->failover_stats, stats, sizeof(*stats));
+
spin_unlock(&nfo_info->stats_lock);
+out:
+ if (primary_dev)
+ dev_put(primary_dev);
+ if (standby_dev)
+ dev_put(standby_dev);
return err;
}
@@ -728,6 +754,7 @@ static struct failover_ops net_failover_ops = {
struct failover *net_failover_create(struct net_device *standby_dev)
{
struct device *dev = standby_dev->dev.parent;
+ struct net_failover_info *nfo_info;
struct net_device *failover_dev;
struct failover *failover;
int err;
@@ -772,6 +799,9 @@ struct failover *net_failover_create(struct net_device *standby_dev)
failover_dev->min_mtu = standby_dev->min_mtu;
failover_dev->max_mtu = standby_dev->max_mtu;
+ nfo_info = netdev_priv(failover_dev);
+ spin_lock_init(&nfo_info->stats_lock);
+
err = register_netdev(failover_dev);
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "Unable to register failover_dev!\n");
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists