[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA5B0431-801C-4F2E-85F5-E329F02D364A@morsecom.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 00:34:30 +0000
From: Corey Costello <ccostello@...secom.com>
To: "noloader@...il.com" <noloader@...il.com>
CC: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: UBSAN: object-size-mismatch in wg_xmit
Get me off this fucking list ffs.
> On Jan 7, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:03 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:22 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:23 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> These UBSAN checks were just enabled recently.
>>> It's indeed super easy to trigger: 133083 VMs were crashed on this already:
>>> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fsyzkaller.appspot.com%2fbug%3fextid%3d8f90d005ab2d22342b6d&c=E,1,RVpgZsRUCGs2jKlumiMAMnpeOF4QdiW5h8GDIsBJPz-orFNwvwCXnceC9n5Bhr1h-G2EsU0tlC7N4QUpHuF6tIMI7tTnBoRjAo5tT-Bk9-Fhe8CppuOL4mqdkA,,&typo=1
>>> So it's one of the top crashers by now.
>>
>> Ahh, makes sense. So it is easily reproducible after all.
>>
>> You're still of the opinion that it's a false positive, right? I
>> shouldn't spend more cycles on this?
>
> You might consider making a test build with -fno-lto in case LTO is
> mucking things up.
>
> Google Posts Patches So The Linux Kernel Can Be LTO-Optimized By
> Clang, https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.phoronix.com%2fscan.php%3fpage%3dnews_item%26px%3dLinux-Kernel-Clang-LTO-Patches&c=E,1,7u3-jWadklYo8ai_XrPNvjnu46LLAyg0hqsGIaMPaoQ5UxtcNM84jrHUgSg4VciXKk9XVpwgyBwD85LbbW5_j195jSH6RrAej45I1kr_XfQ,&typo=1
>
> Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists