netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/11] selftests: Updates to allow single instance of nettest for client and server

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210109150440.33b7ffe2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Sat, 9 Jan 2021 15:04:40 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, schoen@...alty.org,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] selftests: Updates to allow single instance of
 nettest for client and server

On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 11:02:02 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 11:55:39 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
> > On 1/9/21 11:53 AM, David Ahern wrote:  
> > > Update nettest to handle namespace change internally to allow a
> > > single instance to run both client and server modes. Device validation
> > > needs to be moved after the namespace change and a few run time
> > > options need to be split to allow values for client and server.  
> > 
> > Ugh, I forgot to add net-next to the subject line. Let me know if I
> > should re-send.  
> 
> We should be fine, the build bot will default to net-next if there are
> not Fixes tag, and you just told us you're targeting net-next so all
> clear.

Do you want to address the checkpatch issues, tho?