netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 02/11] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: deny vid 0 on the CPU port and DSA links too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Jan 2021 20:05:41 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>,
        Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
        Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 02/11] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: deny vid 0 on the
 CPU port and DSA links too



On 1/8/2021 4:01 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> mv88e6xxx apparently has a problem offloading VID 0, which the 8021q
> module tries to install as part of commit ad1afb003939 ("vlan_dev: VLAN
> 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)"). That mv88e6xxx
> restriction seems to have been introduced by the "VTU GetNext VID-1
> trick to retrieve a single entry" - see commit 2fb5ef09de7c ("net: dsa:
> mv88e6xxx: extract single VLAN retrieval").
> 
> There is one more problem. The mv88e6xxx CPU port and DSA links do not
> report properly in the prepare phase what are the VLANs that they can
> offload. They'll say they can offload everything:
> 
> mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_prepare
> -> mv88e6xxx_port_check_hw_vlan:
> 
> 	/* DSA and CPU ports have to be members of multiple vlans */
> 	if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
> 		return 0;
> 
> Except that if you actually try to commit to it, they'll error out and
> print this message:
> 
> [   32.802438] mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: p9: failed to add VLAN 0t
> 
> which comes from:
> 
> mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_add
> -> mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_join:
> 
> 	if (!vid)
> 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> What prevents this condition from triggering in real life? The fact that
> when a DSA_NOTIFIER_VLAN_ADD is emitted, it never targets a DSA link
> directly. Instead, the notifier will always target either a user port or
> a CPU port. DSA links just happen to get dragged in by:
> 
> static bool dsa_switch_vlan_match(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> 				  struct dsa_notifier_vlan_info *info)
> {
> 	...
> 	if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port))
> 		return true;
> 	...
> }
> 
> So for every DSA VLAN notifier, during the prepare phase, it will just
> so happen that there will be somebody to say "no, don't do that".
> 
> This will become a problem when the switchdev prepare/commit transactional
> model goes away. Every port needs to think on its own. DSA links can no
> longer bluff and rely on the fact that the prepare phase will not go
> through to the end, because there will be no prepare phase any longer.
> 
> Fix this issue before it becomes a problem, by having the "vid == 0"
> check earlier than the check whether we are a CPU port / DSA link or not.
> Also, the "vid == 0" check becomes unnecessary in the .port_vlan_add
> callback, so we can remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
-- 
Florian