[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3eb1ef64-1ce7-5431-be1c-1bd6b4f99bf0@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:55:57 +0200
From: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 09/15] net/mlx5e: CT: Support offload of +trk+new ct
rules
On 2021-01-08 11:59 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:30:48PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> @@ -1429,6 +1600,14 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_add_ft_cb(struct mlx5_tc_ct_priv *ct_priv, u16 zone,
>> if (err)
>> goto err_insert;
>>
>> + nf_ct_zone_init(&ctzone, zone, NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR, 0);
>> + ft->tmpl = nf_ct_tmpl_alloc(&init_net, &ctzone, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> I didn't test but I think this will add a hard dependency to
> nf_conntrack_core and will cause conntrack to always be loaded by
> mlx5_core, which is not good for some use cases.
> nf_ct_tmpl_alloc() is defined in nf_conntrack_core.c.
>
> 762f926d6f19 ("net/sched: act_ct: Make tcf_ct_flow_table_restore_skb
> inline") was done similarly to avoid this.
>
right. we will take a look what we can do with this.
thanks
>> + if (!ft->tmpl)
>> + goto err_tmpl;
>> +
>> + __set_bit(IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT, &ft->tmpl->status);
>> + nf_conntrack_get(&ft->tmpl->ct_general);
>> +
>> err = nf_flow_table_offload_add_cb(ft->nf_ft,
>> mlx5_tc_ct_block_flow_offload, ft);
>> if (err)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists