netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] sfp: add support for 100 base-x SFPs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:22:45 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        UNGLinuxDriver <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] sfp: add support for 100 base-x SFPs

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 02:06:57PM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
> Add support for 100Base-FX, 100Base-LX, 100Base-PX and 100Base-BX10 modules
> This is needed for Sparx-5 switch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
> index 58014feedf6c..b2a9ee3dd28e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,12 @@ void sfp_parse_support(struct sfp_bus *bus, const struct sfp_eeprom_id *id,
>  	    br_min <= 1300 && br_max >= 1200)
>  		phylink_set(modes, 1000baseX_Full);
>  
> +	/* 100Base-FX, 100Base-LX, 100Base-PX, 100Base-BX10 */
> +	if (id->base.e100_base_fx || id->base.e100_base_lx)
> +		phylink_set(modes, 100baseFX_Full);
> +	if ((id->base.e_base_px || id->base.e_base_bx10) && br_nom == 100)
> +		phylink_set(modes, 100baseFX_Full);

Do you have any modules that identify as PX or BX10 modules? What if
their range of speeds covers 100M - you're only checking the nominal
speed here.

Note that this will likely conflict with changes I submitted over the
weekend, and it really needs to be done _before_ the comment about
"If we haven't discovered any modes", not below.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!