netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/6] ethernet: stmmac: stop each tx channal independently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e84b2459-470d-5219-07ed-17626f388f3d@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:28:27 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, joabreu@...opsys.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ethernet: stmmac: stop each tx channal independently

On 1/11/21 3:35 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> If clear GMAC_CONFIG_TE bit, it would stop all tx channals, but users
> may only want to stop secific tx channel.
> 
> Fixes: 48863ce5940f ("stmmac: add DMA support for GMAC 4.xx")
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>

You have a typo in your subject:channal vs. channel. You should also
prefix your patches with "net: stmmac" to be consistent. Finally, since
these are fixes, please indicate clearly which networking tree you are
targeting:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst#n28

Thanks

-- 
Florian