lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1cf3b794-6b84-e6a4-bed3-6b72c480eafa@fb.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:15:14 -0800
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <ast@...nel.org>
CC:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: extend bind v4/v6 selftests for
 mark/prio/bindtoifindex



On 1/11/21 8:17 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Extend existing cgroup bind4/bind6 tests to add coverage for setting and
> retrieving SO_MARK, SO_PRIORITY and SO_BINDTOIFINDEX at the bind hook.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

Ack with a minor comments below.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>

> ---
>   .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++--
>   .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c
> index c6520f21f5f5..4479ac27b1d3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c
> @@ -29,18 +29,47 @@ static __inline int bind_to_device(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
>   	char veth2[IFNAMSIZ] = "test_sock_addr2";
>   	char missing[IFNAMSIZ] = "nonexistent_dev";
>   	char del_bind[IFNAMSIZ] = "";
> +	int veth1_idx, veth2_idx;
>   
>   	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE,
> -				&veth1, sizeof(veth1)))
> +			   &veth1, sizeof(veth1)))
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_getsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTOIFINDEX,
> +			   &veth1_idx, sizeof(veth1_idx)) || !veth1_idx)
>   		return 1;
>   	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE,
> -				&veth2, sizeof(veth2)))
> +			   &veth2, sizeof(veth2)))
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_getsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTOIFINDEX,
> +			   &veth2_idx, sizeof(veth2_idx)) || !veth2_idx ||
> +	    veth1_idx == veth2_idx)
>   		return 1;
>   	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE,
> -				&missing, sizeof(missing)) != -ENODEV)
> +			   &missing, sizeof(missing)) != -ENODEV)
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTOIFINDEX,
> +			   &veth1_idx, sizeof(veth1_idx)))
>   		return 1;
>   	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE,
> -				&del_bind, sizeof(del_bind)))
> +			   &del_bind, sizeof(del_bind)))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static __inline int misc_opts(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx, int opt)
> +{
> +	int old, tmp, new = 0xeb9f;
> +
> +	if (bpf_getsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, opt, &old, sizeof(old)) ||
> +	    old == new)
> +		return 1;

Here, we assume old never equals to new. it would be good to add
a comment to explicitly state this is true. Maybe in the future
somebody will try to add more misc_opts which might have conflict
here.

Alternatively, you could pass in "new" values
from user space with global variables for each option,
but that may be an overkill.

> +	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, opt, &new, sizeof(new)))
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_getsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, opt, &tmp, sizeof(tmp)) ||
> +	    tmp != new)
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, opt, &old, sizeof(old)))
>   		return 1;
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -93,6 +122,10 @@ int bind_v4_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
>   	if (bind_to_device(ctx))
>   		return 0;
>   
> +	/* Test for misc socket options. */
> +	if (misc_opts(ctx, SO_MARK) || misc_opts(ctx, SO_PRIORITY))
> +		return 0;
> +
>   	ctx->user_ip4 = bpf_htonl(SERV4_REWRITE_IP);
>   	ctx->user_port = bpf_htons(SERV4_REWRITE_PORT);
>   
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c
> index 4358e44dcf47..1b4142fcdd4b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c
> @@ -35,18 +35,47 @@ static __inline int bind_to_device(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
>   	char veth2[IFNAMSIZ] = "test_sock_addr2";
>   	char missing[IFNAMSIZ] = "nonexistent_dev";
>   	char del_bind[IFNAMSIZ] = "";
> +	int veth1_idx, veth2_idx;
>   
>   	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE,
> -				&veth1, sizeof(veth1)))
> +			   &veth1, sizeof(veth1)))
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_getsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTOIFINDEX,
> +			   &veth1_idx, sizeof(veth1_idx)) || !veth1_idx)
>   		return 1;
>   	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE,
> -				&veth2, sizeof(veth2)))
> +			   &veth2, sizeof(veth2)))
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_getsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTOIFINDEX,
> +			   &veth2_idx, sizeof(veth2_idx)) || !veth2_idx ||
> +	    veth1_idx == veth2_idx)
>   		return 1;
>   	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE,
> -				&missing, sizeof(missing)) != -ENODEV)
> +			   &missing, sizeof(missing)) != -ENODEV)
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTOIFINDEX,
> +			   &veth1_idx, sizeof(veth1_idx)))
>   		return 1;
>   	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE,
> -				&del_bind, sizeof(del_bind)))
> +			   &del_bind, sizeof(del_bind)))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static __inline int misc_opts(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx, int opt)
> +{
> +	int old, tmp, new = 0xeb9f;
> +
> +	if (bpf_getsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, opt, &old, sizeof(old)) ||
> +	    old == new)
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, opt, &new, sizeof(new)))
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_getsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, opt, &tmp, sizeof(tmp)) ||
> +	    tmp != new)
> +		return 1;
> +	if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, SOL_SOCKET, opt, &old, sizeof(old)))
>   		return 1;
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -107,6 +136,10 @@ int bind_v6_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
>   	if (bind_to_device(ctx))
>   		return 0;
>   
> +	/* Test for misc socket options. */
> +	if (misc_opts(ctx, SO_MARK) || misc_opts(ctx, SO_PRIORITY))
> +		return 0;
> +
>   	ctx->user_ip6[0] = bpf_htonl(SERV6_REWRITE_IP_0);
>   	ctx->user_ip6[1] = bpf_htonl(SERV6_REWRITE_IP_1);
>   	ctx->user_ip6[2] = bpf_htonl(SERV6_REWRITE_IP_2);
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ