[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210111211719.GD1210240@krava>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:17:19 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Prevent double bpf_prog_put call from
bpf_tracing_prog_attach
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:34:48PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:18 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The bpf_tracing_prog_attach error path calls bpf_prog_put
> > on prog, which causes refcount underflow when it's called
> > from link_create function.
> >
> > link_create
> > prog = bpf_prog_get <-- get
> > ...
> > tracing_bpf_link_attach(prog..
> > bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog..
> > out_put_prog:
> > bpf_prog_put(prog); <-- put
> >
> > if (ret < 0)
> > bpf_prog_put(prog); <-- put
> >
> > Removing bpf_prog_put call from bpf_tracing_prog_attach
> > and making sure its callers call it instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > ---
>
> I also double-checked all other attach functions called from
> link_create, they all seem to be fine and don't put prog on failure,
> so this should be the only needed fix. Also, missing:
it'd be easier to spot this if we use refcount_t instead of the atomic64_t,
I replaced it for this refcount and got nice console warning for this bug
then I saw:
85192dbf4de0 bpf: Convert bpf_prog refcnt to atomic64_t
so I guess we need something like refcount64_t first
jirka
>
> Fixes: 4a1e7c0c63e0 ("bpf: Support attaching freplace programs to
> multiple attach points")
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>
> > kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > index c3bb03c8371f..e5999d86c76e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > @@ -2712,7 +2712,6 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> > out_put_prog:
> > if (tgt_prog_fd && tgt_prog)
> > bpf_prog_put(tgt_prog);
> > - bpf_prog_put(prog);
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2825,7 +2824,10 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> > tp_name = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
> > break;
> > }
> > - return bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog, 0, 0);
> > + err = bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog, 0, 0);
> > + if (err >= 0)
> > + return err;
> > + goto out_put_prog;
> > case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT:
> > case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE:
> > if (strncpy_from_user(buf,
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists