[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYtBXr_8HnQEcHn9nQfmMzq_wfdF3jFWzFtOpSF1Uwfug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:29:59 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/7] bpf: support BPF ksym variables in kernel modules
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 8:13 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/8/21 2:09 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Add support for directly accessing kernel module variables from BPF programs
> > using special ldimm64 instructions. This functionality builds upon vmlinux
> > ksym support, but extends ldimm64 with src_reg=BPF_PSEUDO_BTF_ID to allow
> > specifying kernel module BTF's FD in insn[1].imm field.
> >
> > During BPF program load time, verifier will resolve FD to BTF object and will
> > take reference on BTF object itself and, for module BTFs, corresponding module
> > as well, to make sure it won't be unloaded from under running BPF program. The
> > mechanism used is similar to how bpf_prog keeps track of used bpf_maps.
> >
> > One interesting change is also in how per-CPU variable is determined. The
> > logic is to find .data..percpu data section in provided BTF, but both vmlinux
> > and module each have their own .data..percpu entries in BTF. So for module's
> > case, the search for DATASEC record needs to look at only module's added BTF
> > types. This is implemented with custom search function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>
> Ack with a minor nit below.
>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/bpf.h | 10 +++
> > include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 3 +
> > include/linux/btf.h | 3 +
> > kernel/bpf/btf.c | 31 +++++++-
> > kernel/bpf/core.c | 23 ++++++
> > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> [...]
> > /* replace pseudo btf_id with kernel symbol address */
> > static int check_pseudo_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> > struct bpf_insn *insn,
[...]
> > } else {
> > aux->btf_var.reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
> > - aux->btf_var.btf = btf_vmlinux;
> > + aux->btf_var.btf = btf;
> > aux->btf_var.btf_id = type;
> > }
> > +
> > + /* check whether we recorded this BTF (and maybe module) already */
> > + for (i = 0; i < env->used_btf_cnt; i++) {
> > + if (env->used_btfs[i].btf == btf) {
> > + btf_put(btf);
> > + return 0;
>
> An alternative way is to change the above code as
> err = 0;
> goto err_put;
I didn't do it, because it's not really an error case, which err_put
implies. If in the future we'll have some more clean up to do, it
might make sense, I suppose.
>
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (env->used_btf_cnt >= MAX_USED_BTFS) {
> > + err = -E2BIG;
> > + goto err_put;
> > + }
> > +
> > + btf_mod = &env->used_btfs[env->used_btf_cnt];
> > + btf_mod->btf = btf;
> > + btf_mod->module = NULL;
> > +
> > + /* if we reference variables from kernel module, bump its refcount */
> > + if (btf_is_module(btf)) {
> > + btf_mod->module = btf_try_get_module(btf);
> > + if (!btf_mod->module) {
> > + err = -ENXIO;
> > + goto err_put;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + env->used_btf_cnt++;
> > +
> > return 0;
> > +err_put:
> > + btf_put(btf);
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists