lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210111103214.zsradoj5t6drgp73@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:32:14 +0100
From:   Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 2/2] net: dsa: qca: ar9331: export stats64

On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 02:21:43AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 06:32:28AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > May be the "net: dsa: add optional stats64 support" can already be
> > taken?
> 
> I'm not sure that I see the point. David and Jakub won't cherry-pick
> partial series, and if you resend just patch 1/2, they won't accept new
> code that doesn't have any callers.
> 
> You don't have to wait for my series if you don't want to. If you're
> going to conflict with it anyway (it changes the prototype of
> ndo_get_stats64), you might as well not wait. I don't know when, or if,
> it's going to be over with it. It is going to take at least one more
> respin since it now conflicts with net.git commit 9f9d41f03bb0 ("docs:
> net: fix documentation on .ndo_get_stats") merged a few hours ago into
> net-next. So just say which way it is that you prefer.

Ok, thx. If no one is against it, i'll prefer to push this patches now.

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ