[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210112134410.pr5lqv4hcxe3dxfy@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:44:10 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 03/15] net: procfs: hold netif_lists_lock
when retrieving device statistics
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 03:46:32PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> This can be very costly, holding a mutex while traversing the whole
> netedv lists and reading their stats, we need to at least allow
> multiple readers to enter as it was before, so maybe you want to use
> rw_semaphore instead of the mutex.
>
> or just have a unified approach of rcu+refcnt/dev_hold as you did for
> bonding and failover patches #13..#14, I used the same approach to
> achieve the same for sysfs and procfs more than 2 years ago, you are
> welcome to use my patches:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/4cc44e85-cb5e-502c-30f3-c6ea564fe9ac@gmail.com/
Ok, what mail address do you want me to keep for your sign off?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists