lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:11:03 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-can <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Arunachalam Santhanam <arunachalam.santhanam@...bosch.com>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jimmy Assarsson <extja@...ser.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "open list : NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] can: usb: etas_es58X: add support for ETAS ES58X
 CAN USB interfaces

On Tue. 12 Jan 2021 at 22:05, Vincent Mailhol
<mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>
> This driver supports the ES581.4, ES582.1 and ES584.1 interfaces from
> ETAS GmbH (https://www.etas.com/en/products/es58x.php).
>
> Co-developed-by: Arunachalam Santhanam <arunachalam.santhanam@...bosch.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arunachalam Santhanam <arunachalam.santhanam@...bosch.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
> ---
>

Something strange is going on with the mailing list.  I can not
see the second patch (1/1) in the *linux-can* mailing
archive (only the cover letter is present):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20210112130538.14912-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr/T/#

However, the full patch series is present on the *netdev* mailing
archives: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210112130538.14912-2-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr/

Are there any restrictions in regard to the patch size on the
linux-can mailing list? Or did I did anything wrong which
triggered some kind of spam filter?


Yours sincerely,
Vincent

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ