[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc1f14e9-9c20-f137-d131-67b4133a3074@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:25:40 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 15/19] can: tcan4x5x: rework SPI access
On 1/7/21 11:38 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:17:15 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> +struct __packed tcan4x5x_buf_cmd {
>>> + u8 cmd;
>>> + __be16 addr;
>>> + u8 len;
>>> +};
>>
>> This has to be packed, as I assume the compiler would add some space after the
>> "u8 cmd" to align the __be16 naturally.
>
> Ack, packing this one makes sense.
>
>>> +struct __packed tcan4x5x_map_buf {
>>> + struct tcan4x5x_buf_cmd cmd;
>>> + u8 data[256 * sizeof(u32)];
>>> +} ____cacheline_aligned;
>>
>> Due to the packing of the struct tcan4x5x_buf_cmd it should have a length of 4
>> bytes. Without __packed, will the "u8 data" come directly after the cmd?
>
> Yup, u8 with no alignment attribute will follow the previous
> field with no holes.
Ack, without __packed, there's no diff in the objdump on arm.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists