[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MN2PR21MB11666A2B3D026DA710E470ADCEAA9@MN2PR21MB1166.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:31:23 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Long Li <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] hv_netvsc: Prevent packet loss during VF
add/remove
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] hv_netvsc: Prevent packet loss during VF
> add/remove
>
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:53:40 -0800 Long Li wrote:
> > From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > This patch set fixes issues with packet loss on VF add/remove.
>
> These patches are for net-next? They just optimize the amount of packet
> loss on switch, not fix bugs, right?
Yes, those patches are for net-next.
They eliminate the packet loss introduced from Linux side during VF changes. They can be seen as optimizations.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists