netdev - [PATCH net-next 1/7] ibmvnic: prefer 'unsigned long' over 'unsigned long int'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210112064305.31606-2-lijunp213@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:42:59 -0600
From:   Lijun Pan <lijunp213@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Lijun Pan <lijunp213@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/7] ibmvnic: prefer 'unsigned long' over 'unsigned long int'

Fix the following checkpatch warnings:
WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned long' over 'unsigned long int' as the int is unnecessary
WARNING: Prefer 'long' over 'long int' as the int is unnecessary

Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <lijunp213@...il.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index f6d3b20a5361..d4ba5f5a2b08 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -3666,8 +3666,8 @@ static int ibmvnic_send_crq(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
 	int rc;
 
 	netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Sending CRQ: %016lx %016lx\n",
-		   (unsigned long int)cpu_to_be64(u64_crq[0]),
-		   (unsigned long int)cpu_to_be64(u64_crq[1]));
+		   (unsigned long)cpu_to_be64(u64_crq[0]),
+		   (unsigned long)cpu_to_be64(u64_crq[1]));
 
 	if (!adapter->crq.active &&
 	    crq->generic.first != IBMVNIC_CRQ_INIT_CMD) {
@@ -3894,7 +3894,7 @@ static int send_login(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
 	netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Login Buffer:\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < (adapter->login_buf_sz - 1) / 8 + 1; i++) {
 		netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "%016lx\n",
-			   ((unsigned long int *)(adapter->login_buf))[i]);
+			   ((unsigned long *)(adapter->login_buf))[i]);
 	}
 
 	memset(&crq, 0, sizeof(crq));
@@ -4262,7 +4262,7 @@ static void handle_query_ip_offload_rsp(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
 	netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Query IP Offload Buffer:\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < (sizeof(adapter->ip_offload_buf) - 1) / 8 + 1; i++)
 		netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "%016lx\n",
-			   ((unsigned long int *)(buf))[i]);
+			   ((unsigned long *)(buf))[i]);
 
 	netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "ipv4_chksum = %d\n", buf->ipv4_chksum);
 	netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "ipv6_chksum = %d\n", buf->ipv6_chksum);
@@ -4421,7 +4421,7 @@ static void handle_request_cap_rsp(union ibmvnic_crq *crq,
 	case PARTIALSUCCESS:
 		dev_info(dev, "req=%lld, rsp=%ld in %s queue, retrying.\n",
 			 *req_value,
-			 (long int)be64_to_cpu(crq->request_capability_rsp.
+			 (long)be64_to_cpu(crq->request_capability_rsp.
 					       number), name);
 
 		if (be16_to_cpu(crq->request_capability_rsp.capability) ==
@@ -4492,7 +4492,7 @@ static int handle_login_rsp(union ibmvnic_crq *login_rsp_crq,
 	netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Login Response Buffer:\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < (adapter->login_rsp_buf_sz - 1) / 8 + 1; i++) {
 		netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "%016lx\n",
-			   ((unsigned long int *)(adapter->login_rsp_buf))[i]);
+			   ((unsigned long *)(adapter->login_rsp_buf))[i]);
 	}
 
 	/* Sanity checks */
@@ -4835,8 +4835,8 @@ static void ibmvnic_handle_crq(union ibmvnic_crq *crq,
 	long rc;
 
 	netdev_dbg(netdev, "Handling CRQ: %016lx %016lx\n",
-		   (unsigned long int)cpu_to_be64(u64_crq[0]),
-		   (unsigned long int)cpu_to_be64(u64_crq[1]));
+		   (unsigned long)cpu_to_be64(u64_crq[0]),
+		   (unsigned long)cpu_to_be64(u64_crq[1]));
 	switch (gen_crq->first) {
 	case IBMVNIC_CRQ_INIT_RSP:
 		switch (gen_crq->cmd) {
-- 
2.23.0