[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a42a3c10-0183-a232-aec6-b1e6bbfaa800@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:21:00 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mptcp@...ts.01.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] mptcp: better msk-level shutdown.
On 1/12/21 6:25 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Instead of re-implementing most of inet_shutdown, re-use
> such helper, and implement the MPTCP-specific bits at the
> 'proto' level.
>
> The msk-level disconnect() can now be invoked, lets provide a
> suitable implementation.
>
> As a side effect, this fixes bad state management for listener
> sockets. The latter could lead to division by 0 oops since
> commit ea4ca586b16f ("mptcp: refine MPTCP-level ack scheduling").
>
> Fixes: 43b54c6ee382 ("mptcp: Use full MPTCP-level disconnect state machine")
> Fixes: ea4ca586b16f ("mptcp: refine MPTCP-level ack scheduling")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 62 ++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 2ff8c7caf74f..81faeff8f3bb 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -2642,11 +2642,12 @@ static void mptcp_copy_inaddrs(struct sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk)
>
> static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags)
> {
> - /* Should never be called.
> - * inet_stream_connect() calls ->disconnect, but that
> - * refers to the subflow socket, not the mptcp one.
> - */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> + struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> +
> + __mptcp_flush_join_list(msk);
> + mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
> + tcp_disconnect(mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow), flags);
Ouch.
tcp_disconnect() is supposed to be called with socket lock being held.
Really, CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y should have warned you :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists