| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOFY-A3=mCvfvMYBJvDL1LfjgYgc3kzebRNgeg0F+e=E1hMPXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:36:18 -0800
From: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: net: memcg accounting for TCP rx zerocopy
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:31 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:41:05PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > From: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com>
> >
> > TCP zerocopy receive is used by high performance network applications to
> > further scale. For RX zerocopy, the memory containing the network data
> > filled by network driver is directly mapped into the address space of
> > high performance applications. To keep the TLB cost low, these
> > applications unmaps the network memory in big batches. So, this memory
> > can remain mapped for long time. This can cause memory isolation issue
> > as this memory becomes unaccounted after getting mapped into the
> > application address space. This patch adds the memcg accounting for such
> > memory.
> >
> > Accounting the network memory comes with its own unique challenge. The
> > high performance NIC drivers use page pooling to reuse the pages to
> > eliminate/reduce the expensive setup steps like IOMMU. These drivers
> > keep an extra reference on the pages and thus we can not depends on the
> > page reference for the uncharging. The page in the pool may keep a memcg
> > pinned for arbitrary long time or may get used by other memcg.
> >
> > This patch decouples the uncharging of the page from the refcnt and
> > associate it with the map count i.e. the page gets uncharged when the
> > last address space unmaps it. Now the question what if the driver drops
> > its reference while the page is still mapped. That is fine as the
> > address space also holds a reference to the page i.e. the reference
> > count can not drop to zero before the map count.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > mm/rmap.c | 3 ++
> > net/ipv4/tcp.c | 27 +++++++++++++----
> > 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > index 7a38a1517a05..0b0e3b4615cf 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > @@ -349,11 +349,13 @@ extern struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup;
> >
> > enum page_memcg_data_flags {
> > /* page->memcg_data is a pointer to an objcgs vector */
> > - MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS = (1UL << 0),
> > + MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS = (1UL << 0),
> > /* page has been accounted as a non-slab kernel page */
> > - MEMCG_DATA_KMEM = (1UL << 1),
> > + MEMCG_DATA_KMEM = (1UL << 1),
> > + /* page has been accounted as network memory */
> > + MEMCG_DATA_SOCK = (1UL << 2),
> > /* the next bit after the last actual flag */
> > - __NR_MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS = (1UL << 2),
> > + __NR_MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS = (1UL << 3),
> > };
> >
> > #define MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS_MASK (__NR_MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS - 1)
> > @@ -444,6 +446,11 @@ static inline bool PageMemcgKmem(struct page *page)
> > return page->memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_KMEM;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool PageMemcgSock(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + return page->memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_SOCK;
> > +}
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> > /*
> > * page_objcgs - get the object cgroups vector associated with a page
> > @@ -1095,6 +1102,11 @@ static inline bool PageMemcgKmem(struct page *page)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool PageMemcgSock(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > {
> > return true;
> > @@ -1561,6 +1573,10 @@ extern struct static_key_false memcg_sockets_enabled_key;
> > #define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled static_branch_unlikely(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key)
> > void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
> > void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
> > +int mem_cgroup_charge_sock_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page **pages,
> > + unsigned int nr_pages);
> > +void mem_cgroup_uncharge_sock_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned int nr_pages);
> > +
> > static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > {
> > if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && memcg->tcpmem_pressure)
> > @@ -1589,6 +1605,18 @@ static inline void memcg_set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > int nid, int shrinker_id)
> > {
> > }
> > +
> > +static inline int mem_cgroup_charge_sock_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > + struct page **pages,
> > + unsigned int nr_pages)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_sock_pages(struct page **pages,
> > + unsigned int nr_pages)
> > +{
> > +}
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index db9836f4b64b..38e94538e081 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -7061,6 +7061,66 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
> > refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * mem_cgroup_charge_sock_pages - charge socket memory
> > + * @memcg: memcg to charge
> > + * @pages: array of pages to charge
> > + * @nr_pages: number of pages
> > + *
> > + * Charges all @pages to current's memcg. The caller should have a reference on
> > + * the given memcg.
> > + *
> > + * Returns 0 on success.
> > + */
> > +int mem_cgroup_charge_sock_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page **pages,
> > + unsigned int nr_pages)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + ret = try_charge(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, nr_pages);
> > +
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
> > + pages[i]->memcg_data = (unsigned long)memcg |
> > + MEMCG_DATA_SOCK;
> > + css_get_many(&memcg->css, nr_pages);
> > + }
> > +out:
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * mem_cgroup_uncharge_sock_pages - uncharge socket pages
> > + * @pages: array of pages to uncharge
> > + * @nr_pages: number of pages
> > + *
> > + * This assumes all pages are charged to the same memcg.
> > + */
> > +void mem_cgroup_uncharge_sock_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned int nr_pages)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > +
> > + if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > + return;
> > +
> > + memcg = page_memcg(pages[0]);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!memcg))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
> > + pages[i]->memcg_data = 0;
> > + css_put_many(&memcg->css, nr_pages);
> > +}
>
> What about statistics? Should it be accounted towards "sock", "slab/kmem" or deserves
> a separate counter? Do we plan to eventually have shrinkers for this type of memory?
>
While the pages in question are part of an sk_buff, they may be
accounted towards sockmem. However, that charge is unaccounted when
the skb is freed after the receive operation. When they are in use by
the user application I do not think sockmem is the right place to have
a break-out counter.
To double check, what do you mean by shrinker?
> Two functions above do not contain anything network-related,
> except the MEMCG_DATA_SOCK flag. Can it be merged with the kmem charging path?
>
> Code-wise the patch looks good to me.
>
> Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists