netdev - Re: [Patch net] cls_flower: call nla_ok() before nla

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWfG69zQ0dp=eL9_0_02BrjOevpc-Dn9tnDxXJwAUYs6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 23:21:15 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+2624e3778b18fc497c92@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] cls_flower: call nla_ok() before nla_next()

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 6:22 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 1:43 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:52 AM Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:56 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
> > > >
> > > > fl_set_enc_opt() simply checks if there are still bytes left to parse,
> > > > but this is not sufficent as syzbot seems to be able to generate
> > > > malformatted netlink messages. nla_ok() is more strict so should be
> > > > used to validate the next nlattr here.
> > > >
> > > > And nla_validate_nested_deprecated() has less strict check too, it is
> > > > probably too late to switch to the strict version, but we can just
> > > > call nla_ok() too after it.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+2624e3778b18fc497c92@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > Fixes: 0a6e77784f49 ("net/sched: allow flower to match tunnel options")
> > > > Fixes: 79b1011cb33d ("net: sched: allow flower to match erspan options")
> > > > Cc: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
> > > > Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
> > > > Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> > > > Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  net/sched/cls_flower.c | 8 +++++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
> > > > index 1319986693fc..e265c443536e 100644
> > > > --- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
> > > > +++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
> > > > @@ -1272,6 +1272,8 @@ static int fl_set_enc_opt(struct nlattr **tb, struct fl_flow_key *key,
> > > >
> > > >                 nla_opt_msk = nla_data(tb[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_OPTS_MASK]);
> > > >                 msk_depth = nla_len(tb[TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_OPTS_MASK]);
> > > > +               if (!nla_ok(nla_opt_msk, msk_depth))
> > > > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > > >         }
> > > I think it's better to also add  NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, xxxx);
> > > for this error return, like all the other places in this function.
> >
> > I think ext message is primarily for end users who usually can not
> > generate malformat netlink messages.
> >
> > On the other hand, the nla_validate_nested_deprecated() right above
> > the quoted code does not set ext message either.
> nla_validate_nested_deprecated(..., extack), it's already done inside
> when returns error, no?

Yeah, seems fair.

Thanks.