Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:18:23 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Dany Madden <drt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Daris A Nevil <dnevil@...c.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Erik Stahlman <erik@...edu>,
        Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Ishizaki Kou <kou.ishizaki@...hiba.co.jp>,
        Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
        Jens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@...ibm.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Allen <jallen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
        Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>, Paul Durrant <paul@....org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Peter Cammaert <pc@...kart.be>,
        Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        Santiago Leon <santi_leon@...oo.com>,
        Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Utz Bacher <utz.bacher@...ibm.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Rid W=1 warnings in Ethernet

On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:33:49 +0000 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:41:16 +0000 Lee Jones wrote:  
> > > > > Resending the stragglers again.                                                                                  
> > > > > 
> > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1                                                   
> > > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with                                                   
> > > > > niggly little warnings.                                                                                          
> > > > >                                                                                                                  
> > > > > v2:                                                                                                              
> > > > >  - Squashed IBM patches                                                                                      
> > > > >  - Fixed real issue in SMSC
> > > > >  - Added Andrew's Reviewed-by tags on remainder  
> > > > 
> > > > Does not apply, please rebase on net-next/master.  
> > > 
> > > These are based on Tuesday's next/master.
> > 
> > What's next/master?
> 
> I'm not sure if this is a joke, or not? :)
> 
> next/master == Linux Next.  The daily merged repo where all of the
> *-next branches end up to ensure interoperability.  It's also the
> branch that is most heavily tested by the auto-builders to ensure the
> vast majority of issues are ironed out before hitting Mainline.
> 
> > This is net-next:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/
> 
> Looks like net-next gets merged into next/master:
> 
> commit 452958f1f3d1c8980a8414f9c37c8c6de24c7d32
> Merge: 1eabba209a17a f50e2f9f79164
> Author: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date:   Thu Jan 14 10:35:40 2021 +1100
> 
>     Merge remote-tracking branch 'net-next/master'
> 
> So I'm not sure what it's conflicting with.
> 
> Do you have patches in net-next that didn't make it into next/master
> for some reason?
> 
> I'll try to rebase again tomorrow.
> 
> Hopefully I am able to reproduce your issue by then.

Okay so my development branch rebased again with no issue.

I also took the liberty to checkout net-next and cherry-pick the
patches [0], which again didn't cause a problem.

I'm not sure what else to suggest.  Is your local copy up-to-date?

[0]

lee@...l:~/projects/linux/kernel [net-next]$ gcp 0cea4b05acd57..924e1f46aba5e
Auto-merging drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
[net-next 19811db3120a2] net: ethernet: smsc: smc91x: Fix function name in kernel-doc header
 Date: Mon Oct 19 12:47:11 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[net-next dc6f4490cb64e] net: xen-netback: xenbus: Demote nonconformant kernel-doc headers
 Date: Tue Oct 20 08:00:43 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[net-next a3363cb09ae59] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-qos: Demote non-conformant function header
 Date: Tue Oct 20 09:05:38 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[net-next 005462f886c3e] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: Document am65_cpts_rx_enable()'s 'en' parameter
 Date: Tue Oct 20 09:06:57 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Auto-merging drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
[net-next 9fcc32e395e09] net: ethernet: ibm: ibmvnic: Fix some kernel-doc misdemeanours
 Date: Tue Oct 20 09:42:19 2020 +0100
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
[net-next 15ba865fef481] net: ethernet: toshiba: ps3_gelic_net: Fix some kernel-doc misdemeanours
 Date: Tue Oct 20 10:10:14 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[net-next f815eb7cbd7f5] net: ethernet: toshiba: spider_net: Document a whole bunch of function parameters
 Date: Tue Oct 20 10:18:21 2020 +0100
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists