netdev - Re: [patch net-next RFC 05/10] devlink: add port to line card relationship set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210115161048.GE2064789@shredder.lan>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 18:10:48 +0200
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        jacob.e.keller@...el.com, roopa@...dia.com, mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 05/10] devlink: add port to line card
 relationship set

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:12:17PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> index ec00cd94c626..cb911b6fdeda 100644
> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ struct devlink_port {
>  	struct delayed_work type_warn_dw;
>  	struct list_head reporter_list;
>  	struct mutex reporters_lock; /* Protects reporter_list */
> +	struct devlink_linecard *linecard;
>  };
>  
>  struct devlink_linecard_ops;
> @@ -1438,6 +1439,8 @@ void devlink_port_attrs_pci_pf_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, u32 contro
>  				   u16 pf, bool external);
>  void devlink_port_attrs_pci_vf_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, u32 controller,
>  				   u16 pf, u16 vf, bool external);
> +void devlink_port_linecard_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
> +			       struct devlink_linecard *linecard);
>  struct devlink_linecard *
>  devlink_linecard_create(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int linecard_index,
>  			const struct devlink_linecard_ops *ops, void *priv);
> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> index 347976b88404..2faa30cc5cce 100644
> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> @@ -855,6 +855,10 @@ static int devlink_nl_port_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
>  		goto nla_put_failure;
>  	if (devlink_nl_port_function_attrs_put(msg, devlink_port, extack))
>  		goto nla_put_failure;
> +	if (devlink_port->linecard &&
> +	    nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_LINECARD_INDEX,
> +			devlink_port->linecard->index))
> +		goto nla_put_failure;
>  
>  	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -8642,6 +8646,21 @@ void devlink_port_attrs_pci_vf_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, u32 contro
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_attrs_pci_vf_set);
>  
> +/**
> + *	devlink_port_linecard_set - Link port with a linecard
> + *
> + *	@devlink_port: devlink port
> + *	@devlink_linecard: devlink linecard
> + */
> +void devlink_port_linecard_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
> +			       struct devlink_linecard *linecard)
> +{
> +	if (WARN_ON(devlink_port->registered))
> +		return;
> +	devlink_port->linecard = linecard;

We already have devlink_port_attrs_set() that is called before the port
is registered, why not extend it to also set the linecard information?

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_linecard_set);
> +
>  static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>  					     char *name, size_t len)
>  {
> @@ -8654,7 +8673,11 @@ static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>  	switch (attrs->flavour) {
>  	case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL:
>  	case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_VIRTUAL:
> -		n = snprintf(name, len, "p%u", attrs->phys.port_number);
> +		if (devlink_port->linecard)
> +			n = snprintf(name, len, "l%u",
> +				     devlink_port->linecard->index);
> +		n += snprintf(name + n, len - n, "p%u",
> +			      attrs->phys.port_number);
>  		if (attrs->split)
>  			n += snprintf(name + n, len - n, "s%u",
>  				      attrs->phys.split_subport_number);
> -- 
> 2.26.2
>