lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:54:02 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        jacob.e.keller@...el.com, roopa@...dia.com, mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 08/10] netdevsim: create devlink line card
 object and implement provisioning

Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:30:58PM CET, idosch@...sch.org wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:12:20PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> @@ -977,6 +1012,9 @@ static int __nsim_dev_port_add(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev,
>>  	memcpy(attrs.switch_id.id, nsim_dev->switch_id.id, nsim_dev->switch_id.id_len);
>>  	attrs.switch_id.id_len = nsim_dev->switch_id.id_len;
>>  	devlink_port_attrs_set(devlink_port, &attrs);
>> +	if (nsim_dev_linecard)
>> +		devlink_port_linecard_set(devlink_port,
>> +					  nsim_dev_linecard->devlink_linecard);
>
>Should be fold into devlink_port_attrs_set()
>
>>  	err = devlink_port_register(priv_to_devlink(nsim_dev), devlink_port,
>>  				    nsim_dev_port->port_index);
>>  	if (err)
>> @@ -1053,10 +1091,88 @@ static int nsim_dev_port_add_all(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev,
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void nsim_dev_linecard_provision_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +	struct nsim_dev_linecard *nsim_dev_linecard;
>> +	struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev;
>> +	int err;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	nsim_dev_linecard = container_of(work, struct nsim_dev_linecard,
>> +					 provision_work);
>> +
>> +	nsim_bus_dev = nsim_dev_linecard->nsim_dev->nsim_bus_dev;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < nsim_dev_linecard_port_count(nsim_dev_linecard); i++) {
>> +		err = nsim_dev_port_add(nsim_bus_dev, nsim_dev_linecard, i);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			goto err_port_del_all;
>> +	}
>> +	nsim_dev_linecard->provisioned = true;
>> +	devlink_linecard_provision_set(nsim_dev_linecard->devlink_linecard,
>> +				       nsim_dev_linecard->type_index);
>> +	return;
>> +
>> +err_port_del_all:
>> +	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>> +		nsim_dev_port_del(nsim_bus_dev, nsim_dev_linecard, i);
>> +	devlink_linecard_provision_clear(nsim_dev_linecard->devlink_linecard);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int nsim_dev_linecard_provision(struct devlink_linecard *linecard,
>> +				       void *priv, u32 type_index,
>> +				       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +	struct nsim_dev_linecard *nsim_dev_linecard = priv;
>> +
>> +	nsim_dev_linecard->type_index = type_index;
>> +	INIT_WORK(&nsim_dev_linecard->provision_work,
>> +		  nsim_dev_linecard_provision_work);
>> +	schedule_work(&nsim_dev_linecard->provision_work);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void nsim_dev_linecard_unprovision_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +	struct nsim_dev_linecard *nsim_dev_linecard;
>> +	struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	nsim_dev_linecard = container_of(work, struct nsim_dev_linecard,
>> +					 provision_work);
>> +
>> +	nsim_bus_dev = nsim_dev_linecard->nsim_dev->nsim_bus_dev;
>> +	nsim_dev_linecard->provisioned = false;
>> +	devlink_linecard_provision_clear(nsim_dev_linecard->devlink_linecard);
>> +	for (i = 0; i < nsim_dev_linecard_port_count(nsim_dev_linecard); i++)
>> +		nsim_dev_port_del(nsim_bus_dev, nsim_dev_linecard, i);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int nsim_dev_linecard_unprovision(struct devlink_linecard *linecard,
>> +					 void *priv,
>> +					 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +	struct nsim_dev_linecard *nsim_dev_linecard = priv;
>> +
>> +	INIT_WORK(&nsim_dev_linecard->provision_work,
>> +		  nsim_dev_linecard_unprovision_work);
>> +	schedule_work(&nsim_dev_linecard->provision_work);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct devlink_linecard_ops nsim_dev_linecard_ops = {
>> +	.supported_types = nsim_dev_linecard_supported_types,
>> +	.supported_types_count = ARRAY_SIZE(nsim_dev_linecard_supported_types),
>> +	.provision = nsim_dev_linecard_provision,
>> +	.unprovision = nsim_dev_linecard_unprovision,
>> +};
>> +
>>  static int __nsim_dev_linecard_add(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev,
>>  				   unsigned int linecard_index)
>>  {
>>  	struct nsim_dev_linecard *nsim_dev_linecard;
>> +	struct devlink_linecard *devlink_linecard;
>>  	int err;
>>  
>>  	nsim_dev_linecard = kzalloc(sizeof(*nsim_dev_linecard), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -1066,14 +1182,27 @@ static int __nsim_dev_linecard_add(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev,
>>  	nsim_dev_linecard->linecard_index = linecard_index;
>>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nsim_dev_linecard->port_list);
>>  
>> +	devlink_linecard = devlink_linecard_create(priv_to_devlink(nsim_dev),
>> +						   linecard_index,
>> +						   &nsim_dev_linecard_ops,
>> +						   nsim_dev_linecard);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(devlink_linecard)) {
>> +		err = PTR_ERR(devlink_linecard);
>> +		goto err_linecard_free;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	nsim_dev_linecard->devlink_linecard = devlink_linecard;
>> +
>>  	err = nsim_dev_linecard_debugfs_init(nsim_dev, nsim_dev_linecard);
>>  	if (err)
>> -		goto err_linecard_free;
>> +		goto err_dl_linecard_destroy;
>>  
>>  	list_add(&nsim_dev_linecard->list, &nsim_dev->linecard_list);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  
>> +err_dl_linecard_destroy:
>> +	devlink_linecard_destroy(devlink_linecard);
>>  err_linecard_free:
>>  	kfree(nsim_dev_linecard);
>>  	return err;
>> @@ -1081,8 +1210,12 @@ static int __nsim_dev_linecard_add(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev,
>>  
>>  static void __nsim_dev_linecard_del(struct nsim_dev_linecard *nsim_dev_linecard)
>>  {
>> +	struct devlink_linecard *devlink_linecard =
>> +					nsim_dev_linecard->devlink_linecard;
>> +
>>  	list_del(&nsim_dev_linecard->list);
>>  	nsim_dev_linecard_debugfs_exit(nsim_dev_linecard);
>
>What about the delayed work? I believe it can run while you are
>destroying the linecard, so cancel_delayed_work_sync() is needed

Sure, I missed that.


>
>> +	devlink_linecard_destroy(devlink_linecard);
>>  	kfree(nsim_dev_linecard);
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>> index 88b61b9390bf..ab217b361416 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>> @@ -196,10 +196,14 @@ struct nsim_dev;
>>  
>>  struct nsim_dev_linecard {
>>  	struct list_head list;
>> +	struct devlink_linecard *devlink_linecard;
>>  	struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev;
>>  	struct list_head port_list;
>>  	unsigned int linecard_index;
>>  	struct dentry *ddir;
>> +	bool provisioned;
>> +	u32 type_index;
>> +	struct work_struct provision_work;
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct nsim_dev {
>> -- 
>> 2.26.2
>> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ