netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: ipa: GSI interrupt updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:06:23 -0600
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        evgreen@...omium.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        cpratapa@...eaurora.org, subashab@...eaurora.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: ipa: GSI interrupt updates

On 1/15/21 12:59 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 04:42:14 -0600 Alex Elder wrote:
>> On 1/14/21 8:08 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> Dropped the fixes tags (since its not a series of fixes) and applied.
>>
>> Thanks for applying these.
>>
>> Do you only want "Fixes" tags on patches posted for the net
>> branch (and not net-next)?
>>
>> I think I might have debated sending these as bug fixes but
>> decided they weren't serious enough to warrant that.  Anyway
>> if I know it's important to *not* use that tag I can avoid
>> including it.
> 
> The point of the tag is to facilitate backporting. If something is
> important enough to back port is should also be important enough
> to go to net, no?

Yes, agreed and understood.	-Alex