netdev - RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] net:phy: Fix LAN87xx external reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MW4PR17MB42432F1FFA793BDE7286F376DFA70@MW4PR17MB4243.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:27:34 +0000
From:   "Badel, Laurent" <LaurentBadel@...on.com>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "m.felsch@...gutronix.de" <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
        "fugang.duan@....com" <fugang.duan@....com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "richard.leitner@...data.com" <richard.leitner@...data.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "marex@...x.de" <marex@...x.de>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL]  Re: Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] net:phy: Fix
 LAN87xx external reset

 > W/o knowing the exact issue in detail: For the sake of bisectability,
> shouldn't patches 4 and a modified patch 3 be first? After patches 1
> and 2 we may be in trouble, right?

Thank you very much for the quick reply. You are right, this would be a better way to split the changes. 
I will do as you suggest and resubmit on Monday.  


> 
> And it seems you composed the mails manually:
> - subject is prefixed with "Subject:"
> - patch subjects in the cover letter don't match the ones of the
>   respective patches
> 
My bad, I did copy-paste the output of git into the email client and this slipped through - I will be more careful in the future. Sorry about this. 

> For the patch prefixes: Please add a space between net: and phy:
Will do, thank you for pointing this out. 

Best regards
Laurent


-----------------------------
Eaton Industries Manufacturing GmbH ~ Registered place of business: Route de la Longeraie 7, 1110, Morges, Switzerland 

-----------------------------