lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:31:21 -0800 From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name> Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 1/3] net: extract napi poll functionality to __napi_poll() From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name> This commit introduces a new function __napi_poll() which does the main logic of the existing napi_poll() function, and will be called by other functions in later commits. This idea and implementation is done by Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name> and is proposed as part of the patch to move napi work to work_queue context. This commit by itself is a code restructure. Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com> --- net/core/dev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index e4d77c8abe76..83b59e4c0f37 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -6772,15 +6772,10 @@ void __netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netif_napi_del); -static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) +static int __napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, bool *repoll) { - void *have; int work, weight; - list_del_init(&n->poll_list); - - have = netpoll_poll_lock(n); - weight = n->weight; /* This NAPI_STATE_SCHED test is for avoiding a race @@ -6800,7 +6795,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) n->poll, work, weight); if (likely(work < weight)) - goto out_unlock; + return work; /* Drivers must not modify the NAPI state if they * consume the entire weight. In such cases this code @@ -6809,7 +6804,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) */ if (unlikely(napi_disable_pending(n))) { napi_complete(n); - goto out_unlock; + return work; } /* The NAPI context has more processing work, but busy-polling @@ -6822,7 +6817,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) */ napi_schedule(n); } - goto out_unlock; + return work; } if (n->gro_bitmask) { @@ -6840,9 +6835,29 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) if (unlikely(!list_empty(&n->poll_list))) { pr_warn_once("%s: Budget exhausted after napi rescheduled\n", n->dev ? n->dev->name : "backlog"); - goto out_unlock; + return work; } + *repoll = true; + + return work; +} + +static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) +{ + bool do_repoll = false; + void *have; + int work; + + list_del_init(&n->poll_list); + + have = netpoll_poll_lock(n); + + work = __napi_poll(n, &do_repoll); + + if (!do_repoll) + goto out_unlock; + list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, repoll); out_unlock: -- 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists