Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+tfm-k1Pz3bGm9oVJzayMgg=prenqhqrPfm3QnaCqL7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jan 2021 22:52:39 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Tom Cook <tom.k.cook@...il.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cBPF socket filters failing - inexplicably?

Adding appropriate mailing list to cc...

My wild guess is that as soon as socket got created:
socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_ALL));
the packets were already queued to it.
So later setsockopt() is too late to filter.

Eric, thoughts?

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 6:55 AM Tom Cook <tom.k.cook@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Another factoid to add to this:  I captured all traffic on an
> interface while the test program was running using
>
> tcpdump -i wlo1 -w capture.pcap
>
> observing that multiple packets got through the filter.  I then built
> the bpf_dbg program from the kernel source tree and ran the same
> filter and capture file through it:
>
> $ tools/bpf_dbg
> > load bpf 1,6 0 0 0
> > load pcap capture.pcap
> > run
> bpf passes:0 fails:269288
>
> So bpf_dbg thinks the filter is correct; it's only when the filter is
> attached to an actual socket that it fails occasionally.
>
> Regards,
> Tom
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:07 AM Tom Cook <tom.k.cook@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Just to note I have also reproduced this on a 5.10.0 kernel.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 1:42 PM Tom Cook <tom.k.cook@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In the course of tracking down a defect in some existing software,
> > > I've found the failure demonstrated by the short program below.
> > > Essentially, a cBPF program that just rejects every frame (ie always
> > > returns zero) and is attached to a socket using setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET,
> > > SO_ATTACH_FILTER, ...) still occasionally lets frames through to
> > > userspace.
> > >
> > > The code is based on the first example in
> > > Documentation/networking/filter.txt, except that I've changed the
> > > content of the filter program and added a timeout on the socket.
> > >
> > > To reproduce the problem:
> > >
> > > # gcc test.c -o test
> > > # sudo ./test
> > > ... and in another console start a large network operation.
> > >
> > > In my case, I copied a ~300MB core file I had lying around to another
> > > host on the LAN.  The test code should print the string "Failed to
> > > read from socket" 100 times.  In practice, it produces about 10%
> > > "Received packet with ethertype..." messages.
> > >
> > > I've observed the same result on Ubuntu amd64 glibc system running a
> > > 5.9.0 kernel and also on Alpine arm64v8 muslc system running a 4.9.1
> > > kernel.  I've written test code in both C and Python.  I'm fairly sure
> > > this is not something I'm doing wrong - but very keen to have things
> > > thrown at me if it is.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tom Cook
> > >
> > >
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > > #include <sys/socket.h>
> > > #include <sys/types.h>
> > > #include <arpa/inet.h>
> > > #include <linux/if_ether.h>
> > > #include <linux/filter.h>
> > > #include <stdint.h>
> > > #include <unistd.h>
> > >
> > > struct sock_filter code[] = {
> > >     { 0x06,    0,    0,    0x00 }  /* BPF_RET | BPF_K   0   0   0 */
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct sock_fprog bpf = {
> > >     .len = 1,
> > >     .filter = code,
> > > };
> > >
> > > void test() {
> > >     uint8_t buf[2048];
> > >
> > >     int sock = socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_ALL));
> > >     if (sock < 0) {
> > >         printf("Failed to open socket\n");
> > >         return;
> > >     }
> > >     int ret = setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_FILTER, &bpf, sizeof(bpf));
> > >     if (ret < 0) {
> > >         printf("Failed to set socket filter\n");
> > >         return;
> > >     }
> > >     struct timeval tv = {
> > >         .tv_sec = 1
> > >     };
> > >
> > >     ret = setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv, sizeof(tv));
> > >     if (ret < 0) {
> > >         printf("Failed to set socket timeout\n");
> > >         return;
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     ssize_t count = recv(sock, buf, 2048, 0);
> > >     if (count <= 0) {
> > >         printf("Failed to read from socket\n");
> > >         return;
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     close(sock);
> > >
> > >     uint16_t *ethertype = (short*)(buf + 12);
> > >     uint8_t *proto = (unsigned char *)(buf + 23);
> > >     uint16_t *dport = (uint16_t *)(buf + 14 + 20);
> > >
> > >     printf("Received packet with ethertype 0x%04hu, protocol 0x%02hhu
> > > and dport 0x%04hu\n", *ethertype, *proto, *dport);
> > > }
> > >
> > > int main() {
> > >     for (size_t ii = 0; ii < 100; ++ii) {
> > >         test();
> > >     }
> > > }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists